Friday, February 28, 2025

Trust the Plan, the Divine Plan

 

Welcome dear readers. As confusion continues to play a large part of life on earth at this time, the most important guidance we can give is that you not slip into doubt and fear based on outer appearances. A Divine Plan is unfolding, one that will not and can not be stopped, interfered with, or adjusted to suit concepts of how it should look or unfold.

What you are witnessing at this time is only the beginning first steps that are necessary for a world in which the majority remains aligned with the past and old energy. The events and actions taking place at this time are catalysts, serving to push increasingly more people into thinking for themselves, taking a hard look at what they have always accepted without question, and pushing them toward personal empowerment which for most has lain dormant in submission to others.

Throughout lifetimes, humans have been told what was best for them, what was right and wrong, and and the dire consequences of ignoring it. The majority believed then and continue to believe now that they are not capable of figuring these things out for themselves. Over time this belief has become firmly established in earth’s collective consciousness and today many always look to religious leaders, politicians, and experts of every field to tell them what to do, how to live, and what is right and wrong.

Know that the activities of change that are taking place at this time are temporary and represent only the first steps of much that is to come. You cannot fathom all that is coming because you have no reference point. Let go of any three dimensional concepts you may hold about the ascension process and understand that present times are serving to push the un-awakened majority into thinking for themselves and question the old game of “follow the leader”.

Those attempting change from old energy based in the way things have always been done will not be the ones implementing the real changes that are coming simply because states of consciousness that function from a three dimensional level will not and can not align with the higher frequencies coming to the ascending earth.

Your job as spiritually evolved individuals is to trust, actually really trust, that a Divine Plan is unfolding and bringing with it much more than present appearances would have you believe. Allow the process, for it must be a process. Rather than focusing on the plethora of information being pushed at you from every direction, silently and secretly rest always in ONE power, presence, and reality and know that by doing this you are adding Light to the collective which is what you came to do.

Earth is an idea in Divine Mind, a God creation just as spiritual and perfect as every expression of Divine Consciousness. The earth of God’s creating is not subject to beliefs of duality, separation, and two powers, but the earth of man’s creating is, resulting in its having been misused, abused, and almost destroyed by human egos functioning from a consciousness of ignorance and separation. You are the earth, you are every animal, you are the trees, flowers, grasses, water, air, and earth and thus what is done to these spiritual expressions, is done to all, for there is only ONE

Spiritual evolution eventually brings every person to a point at which they must begin to live the truth they know, recognizing self and all others as being God individualized. Those who are spiritually evolved but choose to continue living fully from duality, separation, and two powers simply because it is familiar and allows them to “fit in” will often at some point get a “wake up call”, which is usually some unpleasant event or experience meant to bring the person back to center.

Some of you may be guided to become involved in outer activities, bringing Light to places of turmoil while others of you will be guided simply to stay quiet and hold Light for the world as you go about your day. Trust your intuition and not the opinions of others as to which is right for you.

Whatever the circumstances you may find yourself in at this time, never forget that you are a Divine Being in earth’s lower resonance at this time to learn, clear old energy, spiritually expand, and shift to a higher state of consciousness while at the same time helping earth and others to do the same.

The earth is NOT and never has been an illusion, rather it is mankind’s concepts about the earth that constitute illusion.

The absolute truth about you and everyone else is that you are God/Divine Consciousness individualized. Long ago the master teacher Jesus said; “I and the father are one” but most at that time (and even now) thought this meant only Jesus was one with God. He, as well as many other evolved spiritual teachers have for a very long time been trying to tell humans that “I” is the name of God, the soul and true identity of every person.

You are living in powerful times for earth and all upon her, have been on her, and those to come. These times have been predicted, written about, and awaited for thousands of years, and are finally here. It has begun. Trust and allow the process. We are the Arcturian Group.

channeled by Marilyn Raffaele on February 16, 2025 at OnenessofAll.com

Thursday, February 27, 2025

Non-Duality

Nonduality is a perspective that has been around for centuries in many different traditions including Buddhism, Taoism, early Chan, Advaita Vedanta, Kashmir Shaivism, the mystical wings of the Abrahamic traditions, as well as in Western philosophy. And of course, there are many subdivisions within each of those groups. More recently, there are many people expressing nonduality who are unaffiliated with any tradition—some who have no traditional background, and some who have backgrounds in multiple traditions.

Eastern spiritual traditions have been growing in the West. And over the last few decades, as more of these perspectives have entered Western culture and as social media and the internet have given us access to more and more of them, there has been a veritable explosion of people writing books, holding workshops, giving talks and posting videos on YouTube, all offering various versions of nonduality. Sometimes there are even (dualistic?) pissing contests over which version of nonduality is the most nondual. And that’s really nothing new—such contentious debates have existed for centuries between different schools and traditions.

There are differences and similarities between the many versions of nondualism. But it basically means “not two.” There is diversity in appearance, but no actual separation. Everything is one whole. We are at once no-thing and everything.

One way of seeing it is that our most fundamental reality, what we are—the one constant, the water in every wave, that which we cannot doubt—is this boundless awareness or presence that is seamless and whole, without division or separation. What appears is infinitely varied and ever-changing, yet it never departs from the immediacy of this ever-present Here-Now and can never actually be divided up or pulled apart. Our deepest nature is unconditional love, which is the nature of awareness—it accepts everything, clings to nothing, and finds nothing outside of or other than itself.

Dualism, on the other hand, is where you think you are a separate person encapsulated inside a separate body looking out at a separate and fractured world. This belief gives rise to conflict and feelings of being incomplete and threatened. From this perspective, you imagine that up can exist without down, and that the goal of life is for up to defeat down.

Nonduality sees polarities such as up and down as inseparable aspects of one whole, polarities that only exist relative to each other and are therefore empty of any fixed position or inherent reality—e.g., the ceiling is up in relation to the floor and down in relation to the sky. Instead of opposites being at war, nonduality sees that everything goes together, and that we can never find any exact place where up turns into down—it’s a seamless unicity.

If we watch a movie, we see a multitude of characters, objects, landscapes, events, storylines and dramas, with close-ups and wide-angle shots. Things seem to be moving in time and space. But actually, we are always looking at the immovable, ever-present screen (Here-Now) and what appears is one whole seamless moving picture. Life is very much like this. It never departs from this one bottomless moment Here-Now, but it appears as many different things moving in time and space.

If we put aside everything that can be doubted right now, what remains? The knowingness of being here and the bare actuality of present experiencing are impossible to doubt. What can be doubted and argued about are all the ideas, interpretations, formulations and explanations of this living reality—the abstract maps drawn by conceptual thought—the stories and beliefs about it.

When we believe that we are a separate fragment encapsulated inside a body, navigating our way in a fractured universe, we inevitably feel anxious, deficient, incomplete, insecure. We think we are someone who needs to get somewhere and accomplish something, that we are the author of our thoughts and the maker of our choices, that we (and everyone else) should be better than we are. We seek relief from our uneasiness and dissatisfaction through possessions, knowledge, power, money, sex, intoxicants, spiritual experiences, etc., all of which ultimately leave us unsatisfied and disappointed.

But if we turn our attention to direct experience instead of learned ideas, can we find an actual boundary where “inside of me” turns into “outside of me,” or is the boundary a mental image like the line on a map between two countries? If we open to the bare sensations of our discontent without thinking about it, do we find anything substantial, or simply ever-changing vibrations, appearing and disappearing? What if we look for the thinker of our thoughts or the maker of our choices? Doesn’t every breath, heartbeat, thought, interest, impulse, action and choice emerge from an unfindable source? And what about the awareness beholding this whole movie of waking life, the awareness that sees thoughts as thoughts? Is that perceivable? Does that have a shape, a size, an age, a gender, a nationality, a life situation, a place where it begins or ends? And is there any actual boundary between awareness and the content of awareness, between subject and object?

Every wave in the ocean is inseparable from the ocean. Waving is something the ocean does, a constantly changing movement that never holds to any particular form. There is no actual boundary between one wave and another, and every wave is equally water. No individual wave can decide to go off in a direction other than the one in which the ocean as a whole is moving. Is it possible that everything, including what seem to be “my” independent decisions, are movements of a seamless unicity?

We can call it mind or matter, consciousness or quarks or spirit or intelligence-energy, but the truth is, we don’t know what this is. Even to wonder what this “is” seems predicated on the dualistic notion that this can be somehow formulated, grasped, pinned down and re-presented – that this must be some-thing in particular that can be singled out, seen, experienced (as a particular experience) or possessed as knowledge. But unicity cannot be grasped anymore than the hand can grasp itself. 

There is no actual division between subject and object, awareness and content, form and emptiness, self and not-self, figure and ground, relative and absolute. The apparent divisions are conceptual. And nothing that shows up is a solid, persisting, inherently real, observer-independent form. It may seem so, but the more closely we look, either with science or meditation, we find that nothing holds still or stays the same, that everything is mostly empty space, that nothing exists independently of everything it supposedly is not, and that we never experience anything outside of consciousness. 

Each of us is seeing a unique movie of waking life created by our unique conditioning, but is it possible that the seeing (the awaring) beholding all the different movies is unconditioned, undivided, un-encapsulated, boundless and free? Don’t pick that up as a belief, but explore it in your own direct experiencing Here-Now.

The search for freedom is rooted in the belief that we are bound, that we are separate from the whole, that we are this “me” at the center of our life story. But what if this “me” is an ever-changing, intermittent appearance with no independent existence? Could it be that, prior to all our accumulated ideas about who or what we are, what everyone refers to as “I” is actually the same limitless, undivided here-now (intelligence-energy, seamless unicity, the Tao, wholeness, Totality, boundlessness, whatever we call it)? As we wake up to the utter simplicity of what is, right here, right now, we may find that all our insecurities and fears of death fall away, for they were based on a false idea of reality, like the fear people once had of sailing off the edge of the supposedly flat earth.

If you were to ask any number of writers, teachers, or speakers who use the term to describe their own perspective what they each mean by “nonduality,” you’d undoubtedly get a bunch of very different definitions, some of which would probably be quite contradictory. So, as with all words, and especially words like “nonduality” that have no clear and obvious referent, it’s important to understand what a particular person means when they use this word.

To me, as I use it, nonduality means that everything is an unbroken whole in which everything belongs. It is important to clarify that wholeness is not uniformity. Right now, in present experience, there are infinitely varied, ever-changing qualities of experience—different colors, shapes, textures, sounds, aromas, tactile and somatic sensations, tastes—and there are apparently separate and distinct forms (me and you, dogs and cats, tables and chairs, hearts and brains, planets and stars), each vividly and uniquely itself, and we don’t confuse them with each other or mix them up. 

There are also different dimensions of experience, from the relative world of personal relationships and everyday practical life to the subtlest realms encountered in meditation or yoga. But all of this infinite diversity and variation is appearing as one whole picture, one whole movie, a holographic fractal field of seamless experience, one whole undivided happening. And the closer we look, the more we discover that the boundaries between apparently separate forms don’t actually exist, and the forms themselves are never really solid or persisting. None of them can be pulled out of the whole. In our actual experience, THIS is an infinitely varied seamless whole that never departs from Here-Now. Impermanence is so thorough-going that no-thing ever actually forms to even be impermanent.

Nonduality points to the ungraspable and inconceivable nature of reality. Whatever words or concepts we use to describe it, they are never quite right, because no word or formulation can capture the living reality. Life itself simply can’t be pinned down. Nothing we say or think is the truth.

This living reality is nondual in the sense that it includes everything, and also in the sense that the apparently opposite polarities go together and only exist relative to each other—they are not separate or opposing forces in which one can or should defeat the other. Nonduality thus includes (and transcends) apparent duality. It doesn’t get stuck on one side of any conceptual divide, such as oneness or multiplicity, individuality or unicity, mind or matter, self or no-self, free will or determinism, powerlessness or responsibility, practice or no practice, it is or it isn’t. Nonduality doesn’t land anywhere. It might be described as “not one, not two,” or in the words of Zen Master Dogen, “leaping clear of the many and the one.” It might be called groundlessness.

Nonduality recognizes that nothing ever actually resolves into a persisting form, and that the apparent self at the center of our experience, the apparent “me” who is seemingly authoring “my” thoughts, making “my” decisions, and performing “my” actions, is nothing more than a mirage with no actual substance. It is a phantom created by a mix of ever-changing thoughts, sensations, feelings, stories, mental images, and beliefs. Everything is happening by itself. There is no actual boundary between inner and outer. The inner weather is as impersonal as the outer weather. None of it is personal, none of it means anything about the imaginary “me.”

Even any idea we might have of a larger self, a Big Self—like Consciousness or Awareness—is actually unfindable. There can even be a compelling intuitive or felt sense of this unseen seeing or Ultimate Subject, this Eye (or True I) that cannot see itself, but even the subtlest sense of this open aware space is itself another appearance in present experiencing that cannot actually be separated out or pinned down. 

All we have is just THIS—present experiencing, from the most apparently solid to the most subtle and transcendental. This unfindable aliveness or no-thing-ness never actually forms into some-thing substantial that can be separated out from the wholeness of just this. Any ideas of meaning or meaninglessness, purpose or purposelessness, are thought-created add-ons with no actual reality.

“Nonduality” is, of course, a word, a conceptual idea, but it points to the nature of reality itself. It points to something that cannot actually be conceptualized! It points to THIS, right here, right now, just as it is!

The thoughts and ideas about this living actuality are always dualistic, but THIS is nondual. In other words, the conceptual maps of this living actuality are always in some way dualistic, but the territory itself is nondual. Of course, mapping is something the territory is doing, and this living reality includes thoughts and ideas and maps—but from a nondual perspective, they are recognized as simply appearances or waves of energy, without mistaking the content of them for the actuality they claim to describe or re-present. They are useful within everyday relative reality, but they are never really true.

Getting lost in philosophy and metaphysics and trying to think our way to liberation is not, in my experience, what liberates us from our imaginary bondage. What liberates us is the falling away (or seeing through) of the imaginary problem, which never actually exists in the first place!

By giving open attention to the bare actuality of what is, prior to all the words and explanations about it, by relaxing into the simplicity of just this, it might be noticed that no problem and no self remains. There is simply hearing, seeing, thinking, sensing, etc. And when the thought-created confusion pops up, it can be seen for the illusion that it is, and in the seeing, it dissolves again quite naturally. And nothing is ever really a problem. Everything is included—even the apparent confusion, contraction, suffering, and identification as a separate, encapsulated self is simply another wave-like movement of this indivisible shoreless ocean.

Conditioned thought may label what shows up “confusion” or “ego” or “awareness” or “unicity,” or any other word-label-idea. But the actuality never resolves into any persisting form, and nothing can ever really be pulled out of the whole. No one is doing any of it, and nothing is ever what we think it is.

These words are only pointers or maps. The juice is in the aliveness itself, and that cannot be captured by any words or concepts. Words can only suggest, point out, or invite the recognition of nondual actuality. But here’s a big clue: it’s always already the case. Nothing needs to be different from exactly how it is. How it appears to be never holds still, yet it never departs from Here-Now. The living actuality is NOW, right here, utterly simple, obvious and immediate. It is never absent or hidden in any way. It’s not something in particular (this, but not that). And it’s not nothing. It’s this inexplicable aliveness—the astonishing presence and marvelously freeing no-thing-ness of everything.

Nonduality is not a philosophy. It’s the sounds of traffic and the taste of tea, the fragrance of blossoms and the smell of garbage, colors and shapes and movement—breathing, heart-beating, sensing awaring thinking feeling being – ever-present, ever-changing – not one, not two – just this.

By Joan Tollifson at scienceandnonduality.com on January 22, 2025

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Memory, Praise, and Spirit

 

In this keynote talk given at a conference on spiritual ecology and peace building at St. Ethelburga’s Center for Reconciliation and Peace in London, Emmanuel Vaughan-Lee speaks about how spiritual ecology is not only a framework for navigating the crises we face, but is a memory of living in kinship with the Earth. Turning towards praise and prayer in their myriad forms as pathways to remembering our spiritual connection with the living world, Emmanuel calls us to reawaken this relationship, sweep the dust of our forgetfulness, and hold the Earth in our hearts with love.

The mystics say that we are like a seed; that we hold the blueprint for our highest potential within us, and that much of spiritual practice, regardless of what tradition, is unlocking that potential. But a seed also holds memories—memories of its origins, of its evolution, of its relationships. It holds songs, it holds ceremonies, it holds stories embedded within. And a human being is like a seed: we hold memories—memories of our origins, not just of this incarnation and this life, but as a species, as a whole, where we have come from, how we have evolved.

And although we hear “spiritual ecology” referred to as a field, as a form, as a philosophy, to me, at its root, it is a memory. But not a memory that has been wiped from us; a memory that has been veiled from us, some of us more than others. And what lies deep within is the memory of a time when we lived in relationship with this great Earth; with the recognition of who She is: a sacred, divine being. An alive, animate, sacred, divine being that we lived in relationship with, that we were part of.

Now, that is still true, but it has mostly been veiled from us as our world has evolved from that space of kinship and relationship and reciprocity to one that views this great Earth that’s around us as something separate from us, as something dead, as something to use as a resource.

And, to me, spiritual ecology is about awakening what already lies within. It is not about learning something new. Spiritual ecology is very, very old. It is as old as humanity. It predates what we refer to as “the growth of civilization.” It was there from the beginning. It is our beginning. We have created a framework and a form to understand the crisis we’re in. And that is helpful—to know that the root of our crisis is not just an ecological one or a political one or a social one or an economic one. Yes, it is all of those things. But what lies at the root? What lies beneath? What is there at the core?

For me, that is a spiritual question. Because at the core, in this time of old, we shared a spiritual connection with the Earth. Our spirit met Her spirit. We shared the same spirit. And that connection was slowly veiled, was slowly covered over, was severed at times by our forgetfulness of who She is, by faith-based systems that removed Her at times, by colonization and capitalism and all the vehicles of our modern era which have ripped our world apart. But at the core of all that, there is a spiritual crisis that we are being forced to turn to if we really want to understand what lies at the root. And what lies at the root is a memory held within us. A memory of a space that we share with this divine, sacred being that is the Earth. Divine, sacred being that is the Earth.

And this memory, it must be woken up. It must come alive in us. And many of us may have already felt this memory waking up inside of us; how it rises to the surface when we’re in a space where She is reflected strongly, because maybe the noise of the human drama is quieter than it is on this busy street in the midst of London; where the grandeur of Her beauty washes over us like a wave; where we cannot ignore how She offers Herself and offers Herself and offers Herself.

And in those moments this memory, it rises up inside of us. We feel this connection. We might even feel love. We feel a space that we share. That is not something new, but is something very, very old. It is within our DNA even, in the marrow of our bones. It is part of our physical bodies as much as it is part of our spiritual bodies. And those moments when She shows Her grace and beauty, and we bother to look, reflect and reveal what lies within and that ancient truth that is there at the core of ourselves.

But it also can be woken up through the pain and the grief and the violence and the destruction that is unfolding all around us—the pain that we feel that is too hard to ignore. It is all around us. It is enveloping us. It is taking over our world. It is taking over our lives. And if we allow it to penetrate us, it touches that deep memory and awakens a pain and a love and a grief, and the memory of a connection, and the question that cries out within us that says, why are you doing this?

There is an ancient love, a love like a child has for a mother, that lies within us that can get awoken, that brings this memory to the surface, that shakes the core of our very being. And when this memory bubbles up, surfaces, and comes alive within us, it can so easily fall back into the space that lies deep within us. And the question is, how do we prevent that from happening? How do we allow this awakening through the beauty that She offers and the grace of Her being and the pain and the grief and the suffering of witnessing the destruction we reap upon Her each day—how can we allow that awakening to become something that is a lived experience, a way of being, so that it is not forgotten? So that we don’t have to again try to surface that memory but can allow it to shift the fabric of our being so that we can again return to that fundamental ancient truth—not as a philosophy, not as a set of principles, not as a set of values, but something that we feel, taste, touch, smell, feel. It is embodied in our being. It permeates us from the inside out.

And for me, I have to turn again to something ancient here as a way to support this awakening of this ancient memory. The Sufi mystic Irina Tweedie, she used to say that we are born into this world with two primal ancient impulses. The first one is to survive—to stay alive, to breathe. And the second one is to praise—to praise and to pray to the Divine in all their forms. Not the ones that have been prescribed to us, but all their forms. We come into this world with these primal impulses. And this ancient memory that lies deep within us must be nourished by an ancient knowing that we come into this world with, this understanding of what it means to praise. And when we are children and we come into this world, we know this. We know how to praise Her. We don’t need to use words. We do not need to bow our heads and bring our hands together. We do not need to learn a dogma or a system. It is present within us. It is innate.

How many stories have we heard of children who say they talk to God? But they talk to God in all the ways that they feel to; not just in the ways that we are told we are supposed to talk to God. It is innate within us, just as this memory is innate within us—this ability to praise, to offer, to bring this ancient recognition of what it means to be a human being.

Because if we are part of this ancient, divine fabric of life that is animate and alive and sacred, then we must pay homage to that. We must give gratitude to that. We must relate to that. And not relate with our minds or our conditioning, be that individual or collective or religious or cultural, but to relate to it as we really are: as a spirit, as a soul. So that spirit can meet spirit. The great spirit that is this divine being, that is our Earth—because She is that—demands to be met from our spirit. Because a prayer is essentially finding a way to access the spirit within and offer it to the greater spirit. Regardless of what tradition you come from, prayer offers that way of giving thanks, of offering gratitude, of being in a space of reverence, and of creating a relationship. Prayer is as much about thanks and reverence and forgiveness—these forms we know—as it is about making a relationship, validating a relationship, building a relationship, so that our spirit and Her spirit can again be one spirit and not severed into two.

And there are so many ways to praise. The one thing we have done over all these millennia is develop the most amazing ways to praise—the intricacy, the diversity of how we have done this. Some ways are secret. They belong to a people and a place and a culture and should be kept as such. But some ways are universal: listening to the Divine, offering our thanks, offering our forgiveness. And I think that is important, because we have done so much that demands forgiveness. Universal ways of praise. Universal ways of building a relationship. And if we integrate prayer and praise into our lives, whether we come from a faith-based tradition or we do not, we support the awakening and the space of Her that lives within us to become an embodied way of being. An embodied way of being. One does not just pray once and say, I’ve done that. One returns again and again and again to offer praise, to offer thanks.

Yes, there are high days of worship. There are ceremonies. There are times of the year when a special offering can be made. But real prayer must be done constantly; must be part of the way we live our lives. And again, it does not require words to be uttered. It can be the recognition of seeing Her as She greets us as we move about our day in the myriad ways that She exists around us. Even in an urban setting like this part of London, She shines down upon us. We hear the birds in the street. There are more ways to see Her than we have eyes to perceive Her. Recognition, acknowledgment. We walk upon Her as we move about our day. We drink Her. We nourish ourselves with Her as we eat our daily bread. And those are just a few. We cannot limit the way that we praise Her.

They say there are as many ways to praise God and reach God as there are human beings. But we have limited that. And we have narrowed our view of the Divine to a transcendent God in heaven and abandoned the Divine beneath our feet. And this ancient memory is a return to the understanding that She is there beneath our feet. We cannot ignore that anymore. For a limited idea of the Divine is part and parcel of what has led us to be in the situation that we are in. And we must shift that.

And it is the responsibility of all, I feel, to take this serious spiritual understanding into account, whether we are part of a faith-based tradition or not. We must evolve. We must return to this ancient understanding and integrate it into the reality of our lives in response to this great crisis that we are in. Because we will not fix this crisis by trying to keep the oil in the ground alone, or shifting our transportation systems to be green and clean, or even by abandoning capitalism and facing the error of our ways and our history and what we have done to the planet and the people that make it their home. We must include the divine nature of this Earth again in the foundation of who we are as human beings, as individuals, and, I hope one day, as societies.

And prayer must be part of that. Prayer must not be made taboo, as it has become in an increasingly secularized modern world, partially because we have limited the understanding of prayer and of praise, and said it must happen in a church on a Sunday or in a mosque five times a day. No. This ancient memory we hold within us and the space we are brought into in this world with this innate understanding of praise, it challenges that.

In some ways, we have to unlearn these systems of praise in order to connect to the true potential of what it means to be a human being in praise. And the most amazing thing about prayer and praise, to me, is that it never is just about us. It is not only for healing the separation that we have as individuals with the Earth, with this divine being that is our home. It is that, but it is much more, and this is where it becomes about spirit and matter to me, not just as individuals, but as part of a holistic healing that must unfold. For if we are to really, not only heal, but survive, then we must shift as a whole, which means our actions must benefit the whole. And prayer has the capacity to benefit the whole.

Any real spiritual act, if it is offered from the depths of our being, from our hearts, from something that is true, it has the power to benefit more than just us. That is what we refer to as a spiritual technology. That when we offer and we offer for the sake of others, whether that be other human beings or other more-than-human kin or even this great divine being that is the Earth herself, then it benefits the whole.

And we often hear about the insignificance of our individual choices in this environmental space; that while we may eat well and recycle and drive the right car and take public transport and fly as little as we can, those contributions will not really make a difference, because the real change must come from system change, from policy change, from corporate change. And while that may be true, in part, prayer offers something to me that can—regardless of how insignificant we might feel in our contribution and what it can make—it offers something that can change the system.

To me, prayer and praise is a radical act. It can be revolutionary as long as we don’t limit it. It benefits the whole, and our individual contribution can help heal the divide between spirit and matter. It is almost as if the spirit that we have within that we can harness, whether through the awakening of the beauty of Her bounty, or the despair and grief and pain of what we have done to Her, the spirit that is awakened from that moment—that is nourished and embodied more deeply through prayer—it creates a thread, a thread that can be woven between spirit and matter to heal the divide. Each prayer can be an offering like that.

And the wound is deep, and the wounds are many. And prayer alone won’t heal it. It must be done in concert, in combination, in relationship with all the other things that we know must be done. But if prayer and praise and the recognition of the sacred nature of creation lies at the root of our way of being, then all actions come forth from that understanding. Then values are obvious: reverence, interconnectedness, compassion, service, of course. How could they not be anything but. So that the action one takes is threaded with spirit, is threaded with love, as we offer it for the sake of the whole.

The Sufis, they call themselves “sweepers,” because they devote their lives through the power of the remembrance of the Divine to sweeping the dust of forgetfulness that lies upon the face of the Earth. And to me, prayer is like that. Prayer is a sweeping of forgetfulness, because it is an honoring of remembrance. It is an affirmation, and an affirmation is more powerful than a negation. Threads of love that weave together the split of spirit and matter are present in each of our prayers and each of the ways that we look upon Her, that we hold Her in our hearts, as we awaken this ancient, ancient memory of what spiritual ecology really is: spirit and home. And that includes all of us, and we must honor that.

by Emmanuel Vaughan-Lee at emergencemagazine.org on August 29, 2024

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Four Steps in Connecting to Higher Dimensions

 

We are The Creators. We are twelfth-dimensional collective of nonphysical beings and we are here to help. We do seek you out, and we do notice when one of you is interested in connecting to the nonphysical. We do tend to place more of our attention on those who can and are willing to receive an energetic transmission from us, and that is not us playing favorites. It’s just us being efficient. Your bodies are very efficient machines, and the universe is very efficient as well. Your ecosystem is incredibly efficient, and so it would follow that we are efficient in the nonphysical.

We do seek you out because we seek connection. We desire to be of service and we know we can be of service to those who open up to us and receive our transmissions of energy, light, and love. We go where the openings are, and we invite you to consider how often you are opening up to the higher-dimensional planes. We know that many of you speak out loud to your guides and to other higher dimensional beings and collectives, and then many of you wait for an answer or some results in the physical to show up and to prove to you that you were heard, but it is necessary for you all to take that final step of opening up to receive.

Open yourselves up, because what you will receive is exactly what you’ve been asking for. Open yourselves up because it is safe to do so, and open yourselves up because the more you do, the more that will come to you. This is a dynamic and interactive universe, and there are so many who want to interact with you. We know that many of you are waiting for the ships to land and the ETs to come out of those ships and walk right up to you, but you don’t have to wait.

And you certainly don’t have to wait for anyone else within the human collective to be ready for any type of contact experience. You can make connections right now, and you can receive more of what you’ve been asking for in any given moment. Step one is to acknowledge that you are not alone. Step two is to acknowledge that your requests have been heard. Step three is to acknowledge that your requests have been answered in the affirmative. Step four is to open up and receive.

Now why is it that most of you don’t ever get to step four? Perhaps it is a lack of faith and perhaps it is that you wanna do it all yourselves. If you do everything, then you get to take all the credit. And so part of this process is letting go of the egoic need to be the one who does it all and then gets to take all the credit.

The dimension that you are moving into, which is, of course, the 5th dimension, is all about collaboration. It’s all about coming together. It’s all about being a collective consciousness because that’s what you already are, and much of this journey is you becoming who and what you already are. We are here to help, and so are so many others in the nonphysical and in the physical dimensions. You don’t even have to ask for the help, because you have already asked and you ask subconsciously all the time.

But you do have to open up to receive what is already yours. And we are so very happy to provide it, and so are so many others who are your helpers, your guides, your ancestors, your fairies, all that you can imagine and so much more.

We are The Creators, and we love you very much.

channeled by Daniel Scranton at danielscranton.com

Monday, February 24, 2025

Lesson from the Anasazi: Perhaps Less is More

 

For years I had known of a certain side canyon of the San Juan that was supposed to be particularly lovely, a place resonant with power and almost untrodden. The woman who told me about it was a beautiful desert rat, sunburnt dark, with quick, clear eyes; she knew the canyon country like the lines in

her hard hands. She drew me a map on a paper napkin in a cafe in El Paso and made me promise not to tell anyone else about it.

Somehow I didn't go there for a long, long time; it was one of those trips you save up—like a lump of pemmican or a last gold coin—against hard times. I kept the map, folded into a tiny square, with a bundle of old photographs, letters, chips of nacre from Mexican beaches, a zigzagged shard from Keet Seel, the long-deserted pueblo city north of Black Mesa, beyond Skeleton Canyon. That scrawled scrap of a map was something like a talisman, evoking the luminous energy of the woman who had drawn it (I never saw her again) and the mystery, the promise, of her canyon.

And then one autumn, suddenly it was time to go. Fall is a good season to go into the San Juan desert. In the summer, temperatures rise above 110 degrees, the sun batters all color and shadow out of the land, and springs, seeps and

waterholes dry up. Water is the great mystery out here: you see why the Indians made rain a sacrament, the wet mountains the abode of gods, and springs into shrines. All water—brackish, saline, stale—is holy water.

The whole land is shaped like water—combers of slick rock, tumbled surfs of tumulus, whirlpools of dust and sand—but the stuff itself is elusive, lost. There is rainfall and runoff and the spring snowmelt, but these are rare, scant things. Somewhere far, far below in the knotted depths of stone, the San Juan rolls

down its subterranean gorge, deep with the rains and snows of the Rockies; but up in the side canyons it is bone dry. The air is burnt, sharp as a steel knife laid on the tongue. You feel as though you could sniff out a glass of water blindfolded at a hundred yards. Walking, your fingers swell and turn a bruised yellow in a couple of hours. Your mind wanders to chimeras, gauzy things of the imagination. No wonder so many religions began in the desert! Even with a couple of full canteens gurgling in your pack, the thought of thirst is never really absent.

And yet, you can just as easily drown or freeze to death in these same canyons. Sometimes it seems that the San Juan is imbued with a sly, native sense of humor, the soul of a coyote. It turns you into jerky one day and freeze-dries you the next; dries you out, then drowns you. I once got caught by a March blizzard down there, with a wind chill factor somewhere way below zero, snowflakes thick and wet. whipping like tiny daggers up canyon. I hiked on, went into extreme hypothermia and survived only by hunching in a cave out of the wind, building

a fire out of damp sticks and driftwood and standing over it while the steam poured off my soaked clothing. The next day the snow melted and the canyon ran waist-deep with icy water; you could have drowned in some of the big pools. Two days later the sky was hot and clear, the snowmelt had vanished and I trudged through dry sand looking for drinking water in the shadow of boulders in the lee of the cliffs. It is a maddening and wondrous place, the San Juan.

But now it was autumn—a sweet, easy season in the desert—and it was time to go, to follow that old fragment of map, to see where it led.

I had a friend at the time, a tiny woman named Susan, who lived alone in a cabin in the hills and worked silver for a living. She was a tough little person: she had banged the cabin together herself out of scrap lumber, and every year she shot an elk, out of season, and lived on the meat through the winter. She also had an ancient Chevy pickup truck that seemed as if it might make it to Utah and back. One part of me wanted to go walk the canyon alone: a kind of walking vision-seeking, like the traditional Plains Indians used to do. (It is interesting that

in both Japanese Zen and Plains Indian animism, there are walking and sitting forms of contemplation.) Alone, I would be meeting the canyon solely on its own terms. But I was more than a little in love with Susan; and she would be a good person to walk the canyon with: she was spare with her words, and a hard walker. Like all real hunters, she fit into the country with no false notes, unobtrusive. She would be a good companion, I thought.

One colorless, drizzling dawn, we loaded up her truck with gear. We drove west, feeling like escaping prisoners. The autumn colors were delicate, like those of a

Sung scroll. The Japanese have a word, "aware," which means a kind of beauty made more intense, poignant, by its very impermanence: beauty catalyzed by time into something almost unbearable. It was one of those autumn days in the

mountains.

We drove west into Utah, skirting the southern edge of the La Sal Mountains, aspens gold, a thin frost of snow on the tops of the peaks. At La Sal Junction we turned south into the sandstone country. I drove south, past the hogans of the northernmost Navajos and through the Ute town of White Rock; and then, somewhere south of the Abajo, or Blue Mountains, we turned west again.

To the east Sleeping Ute Mountain peered over the horizon, opal blue. Far, far to the southwest, Navajo Mountain was jade, in a black plume of rain. To the south the Lukachukai and Chuskai mountains and the rusty turrets and minarets of Monument Valley were dim in the haze; to the west, ferrous cliffs. The sky had broken and it was a cool, lucid afternoon; cumulus clouds sailed like a fleet of giant luminous cauliflowers across the sky.

We turned off the highway onto a dirt road that cut away across the flats, through sagebrush and scrub juniper. If it hadn't been for the map, we never would have seen it. The road forked and forked again, and got worse; we bumped down into a dry wash and out again. Feral cattle spooked and trotted away through the chaparral in whirlwinds of dust. The road petered out, became a track. Before us, all was stony flatlands, brush; our canyon had hidden itself well.

We parked the truck in the shade of a lone Cottonwood, shouldered our packs and started walking, wandering across the featureless terrain. Anyone following us would have thought we were lost; but after about half an hour, trusting to the vague markings on the map, we came to the beginnings of an arroyo cutting south across the plain. This was it: the way down, the door to the underworld. We descended.

There was the remnant of a cattle trail, and we followed it down, through cattails, past pools of green, rotten water. The water vanished into the earth; we were left with sand and tumbled stones We crossed the skittery, neurotic tracks of mice and the paw prints of a lone coyote coming up the canyon to drink and then going down again.

The cliffs closed in on either side. Slick-rock chutes dropped in. We sloshed through deep sand, then crossed a floor of cracked bedrock. And then suddenly the canyon dropped off in a two-hundred-foot overhang: suddenly there was no place to go, no water in sight, and evening was coming on fast.

We consulted our map. It was unclear, but there was a suggestion of another side canyon entering the main canyon; perhaps we were in the wrong one. Mentally flipping a coin, we climbed out over the rimrock to the south and wandered across

the naked sandstone, looking for another way down into the earth. The sun was falling fast, casting long shadows.We were both getting a little worried, and a little cross. Danger on a quest is all right; discomfort, inconvenience, are not.

Finally we found another side canyon, a narrow notch dropping down almost like a trapdoor. We climbed down into another time, where it was easy to believe that an owl's cry meant death, that coyotes were tricksters, that weird bent mannikins called Mudmen lived at the bottom of the great rivers. Across the fire Susan combed the sand out of her hair and smiled that ancient, woman's smile at me. A different time, the past, where, they say, we must go to be reborn, to find our future, whatever it may be.

The next morning we packed up, broke camp and headed down canyon. It was a lukewarm sunny day. Just as the El Paso stranger had said, there were Indian

ruins everywhere in ledges and caves in the cliffs. About 9,000 years ago, paleo-Indian hunters and gatherers had filtered down into this canyon country and somehow learned to live hereabouts. Anything that was edible, they ate. That is how you survive in the desert—you become an extreme omnivore. These early desert people snared and netted rabbits and birds, and gathered and ground seeds, roots, berries. Insects and larvae were important sources of protein, as they are in all arid pre-agricultural societies. (The Australian aborigines treasure the wichetty grub, a fat, buttery larva they dig out of the ground and eat like a wriggling ice cream cone.) What few artifacts these desperate people had were breathtakingly beautiful in their craftsmanship: grinding stones, nets, basketry.

Thousands of years later, agriculture came north from Mexico, as did sorcery. Life was transformed: corn, beans, and squash, the holy trinity of meso-America, gave the desert people a tighter, surer grasp on life. Crude pit houses and cave camps grew into towns, pueblos.

Anasazi is a Navajo word meaning the old, or original, people; these Anasazis lived in the canyons of the San Juan until about 1200 AD, when they migrated south to New Mexico and northern Arizona, where their descendants, the Pueblo Indians, still live. This canyon country is just too friable, too fragile for long-term, intensive habitations. The Anasazis cut too much timber for roof beams, cleared too much brush for fields and just plain overbred. A cyclical drought may or may not have been the final disaster: archeologists, who reconstruct whole empires and civilizations out of the glaze on potsherds and discern the pattern of flakings on a spearpoint, disagree. It is too esoteric a point to do more than dream on: the Anasazis moved south, and that is that.

Hiking the canyon, we still felt the presence of those Old Ones. At one place on the cliff, we found hundreds of handprints in reddish paint, eerily like dried blood. You could still see the whorls in the fingerprints. Some of the handprints were tiny, the hands of small children or infants. Below, in the ruins of a room, was a human pelvis, gleaming in the dust. On the Nile the fellahin place handprints on their walls to ward off the evil eye, djinns, and demons. Was this cliff wall of hands a barrier against outsiders, spiritual or otherwise? Or was it a kind of simple codification of census, a symbolic counting up of the souls of a community?

We trekked down canyon; the gods of the place were painted, scratched on the rocks. There was a feeling of being watched, a prickling at the back of the neck. The gods, demigods, spirits or whatever they were, were like the drawings of

children or of the mad and they had that same inexplicable divinity to them—doodles, but fairly hissing with an arcane energy. Snakes, lightning, circles in circles in circles, arrows.

That god from the far south of Mexico, a new-world Orpheus hunched over, playing a flute. And those tall, threatening isosceles figures with horns. Climbing up into the ruins of a kiva or a storehouse full of cobs of mummy corn, we felt like trespassers, invaders, ashamed.

Evening: miles down, the canyon walls went gray to delicate gold to roan to gray again. A wind came up the canyon, rippling the sand, jingling the yellow cottonwood leaves. We had come a long way that day: the canyon had turned and turned and turned again, till the map, with its side canyons and its springs

and ruins, had lost all congruence with the country. It was a maze with canyon after canyon, ravine after ravine winding away into the rock.

There was not another human being for forty, fifty miles. Far above, over the canyon rim, across the desolate mesa tops, a Piute rancheria, a Navajo sheep camp, a Mormon cowpoke reading by kerosene in a beat-up trailer. It was a precious feeling to be so alone: worth the sore feet, the sun-stung eyes, the muddy water we had to drink that looked like coffee and tasted like stone. The fire burned down; and in the last red light of the coals, I found myself looking at Susan and thinking of Deer Woman, the sensuous spirit in North American Indian

tales who lures men off into the back country and steals their souls.

I found myself thinking more and more about the Anasazi, the Old Ones, who had lived here and then moved on. It seemed to me that there was a secret, a message, wrapped up in their lives. They scratched farms out of the valley floor; built their aeries of riprap and mud; incised their gods and dreams on the cliffs; hunted deer, rabbit, desert bighorn; made baskets and pottery, lots of it, decorated with cord relief and colors of a smoldering barbaric beauty. Nothing special in that, perhaps: neolithic farmers living in tiny, simple communities that were little more than bands of a few extended families.

They were poor, if wealth can be measured in a society's energy and material available per capita. The garbage cans of any suburban American household probably hold more calories than the average Anasazi family got in a week. There was a kind of Taoist austerity to their lives; and yet, if their modern Pueblo descendants are any evidence of how they lived, they somehow squeezed a rich, sophisticated culture out of these fields of dust. Pueblo metaphysics—we would call it animism or magic—carried the theory of relativity into every corner and

crevice of existence. You danced thunder out of the sky, rain out of the clouds, crops out of the earth. The bitter lightning in the rattlesnake speaks to the rain that gathers around the dark mountains. You bury your ancestors and they rise again as corn; turquoise embodies sky, abalone shell thunderhead, feathers wind and storm . . .

However it worked, it propelled the Anasazi way of life through drought, the raids of the Utes, Navajos and Comanches, and the imperial flexings of Spain and Anglo-America. It was a sinewy, enduring kind of poverty, indeed: it will probably outlast our petrochemical bubble of a republic by aeons.

We have contrived a technology so abstruse that it takes us 3,000 calories of energy to produce a 300-calorie can of corn. The waters rise on Lake Powell, and silt drifts slowly against the dam at Page. The cities burn bright, stoked on the flesh of mountains and mesas and on the blood of rivers. Some say that our complex systems contain the seeds of their own destruction; that like rapidly growing crystal lattices, they are brittle, unstable in proportion to their very size

and rate of growth. They point out that those tiny gold-crazed gangs of Spaniards destroyed the urban Inca and Aztec empires in a matter of months, but that life in the tribal villages goes on undisturbed even today. And they claim that the

Pueblo Indians will still be dancing their green-corn dances, and 'dobing their kiva walls, long after the last light in Los Angeles has gone out. Who knows?

Perhaps they are right, Lao-tze and Mao Tse-tung and Crazy Horse and all the rest. Perhaps less is more. Perhaps all that matters, all that lasts, is life close to the ground, down to the bedrock: village, pueblo, ejidos, sun-dance encampment; and all of our cities, our grand operas and coups, our fads and

inventions, are just chaff in the wind.

excerpted from The Hidden West by Rob Schultheis, pp 29-41

Sunday, February 23, 2025

Imagine

 

Greetings. I am St. Germaine and I come to you with my title of Saint because it is to let you know that you also have this same title.

Now what is a saint? A saint is seen as someone who does good works, one that is connected to the Divine. But a saint is also one that can create, that can create miracles and that is your heritage, that is your legacy.

That is what I come to share with thee today. That you too have the capacity, the ability. You have within the very essence of your soul, within your genes, within your DNA, however you wish to see it, as a gift from God even, that you have the ability to create miracles.

Now how does one go about that?

How, I ask you to find that which humors thee. For humor brings you into the higher vibration and being in the higher vibration is where miracles do occur.

And I do not say, can occur. I say, do occur. Many times you are creating miracles without even realizing you are doing it. You wonder, wow! Why is it that all of a sudden money is coming my way? Or why is it that my relationship seems to be better? Or why is it that my health is improving?

Because they were originally wishes, thoughts that you decided within, without maybe realizing it, that you would like to have in your life.

And you say, St Germaine, I have those wishes all the time and it does not happen. Beloved, when you are in the higher vibration, it does. For the thoughts attract the energy that is the creating energy to make whatever it is that you wish to happen.

It is as simple as that. It is not work, it is play. So I ask you, will you come play with me? Will you step into the world of a child, of laughter, of fun, of imagination? For this is where it starts.

Imagination is a gift. It is part of your makeup. It is what you were given as you were born and even before. Imagination is a tool that is meant to stay with you throughout all your years. Imagination opens the doors. It opens the viewpoint that all can be as you wish.

You have heard of the dancers and the athletes that perhaps had injuries and were told they could never perform again. But yet with their imagination they began exercising. With their imagination, they saw what could be accomplished. Through imagination, they combined it with belief and yes, this is not that this will be, but that this is.

I ask you to do the same.

What is it that your heart desires? Become a child. Laugh! I am known for my laughter. I am well known for my fun. It is to bring these gifts to you.

Step into that world of delight, of even taking a morsel, perhaps a chocolate and savoring it and saying, this is delicious, thank you! For that brings you into the higher vibration. And you say, just as I have this chocolate that tastes so delicious, what else would I like to taste that is so delicious?

I am now tasting the freedom that I am wishing for. I am now tasting the excellent health, the full health that I have been yearning for. I am now tasting the abundance that I have been asking for.

What will you do with all of that beloved? Begin to make your list, make a file. Bring it into reality and then let it go. For it has been put into motion.

This is the magic of the creation laws of the universe and of course it will never hurt to use my violet fire and let it burn up anything that is a doubt that you have this ability. And use it under your imaginative ideas for it also is a tool of creation.

And so I leave thee. Laugh, smile, imagine! Imagine that you are even more than you have ever seen yourself to be.

channeled by Lee Degani at connectiontohealing.org on January 17, 2025

Saturday, February 22, 2025

Quick Fix for Restoring Good Health

 

When your liver works right, every other cell in your body works right. So when you choose a food to put in your mouth to feed your body, choose a food that satisfies two conditions: 1) it must protect your liver, and 2) it must feed your gut. Foods that satisfy both precepts are healthy foods; those that do neither are poisonous; and those that do one or the other, but not both, are not the best choices you can make.

All degenerative disease in the modern world is the result of eaters having loaded their livers with sugars that the body cannot help but convert to and store as unhealthy fats, and starving their gut of the fiber needed by beneficial bacteria there that process what we eat so we can utilize the nutrients.

Implementing these two precepts is difficult and only possible by eating real food—which is not what the food industry is selling, by and large. The responsibility is upon each of us to be discerning in what we put in our mouths. We must eat as if our life depends upon it; eat as if our optimal health depends on it.

When you take care of your liver you are promoting metabolism. The liver is where virtually all the metabolism in the body occurs. The liver removes anything that might be poisoning the body. The liver literally sends out energy to the rest of the body. The liver is ground zero for health. Good Liver = Good Body.

If you want to protect your liver you have to protect it from toxins. There are a lot of things that are toxic to our good health, but the largest source of toxins in the foods we eat is sugar, and alcohol and drugs if they are consumed. So, if you want better overall health, the rules are simple: First cut out sugars of all kinds, as well as artificial sugars, and stop or minimize the use of alcohol. Stopping the use of drugs goes without saying, but what may not be as apparent is the inclusion of regular exercise to optimize the function of every organ in the body. Accomplish this and you are 90% of the way there.

Then we must take care of our gut. Before the advent of packaged and microwavable food, gut bacteria were used to getting what they wanted to eat—fiber. But now those same bacteria are starving, and they’re not happy. They are causing the normally impervious intestinal barrier to become “leaky,” leading to inappropriate immune system activation and chronic inflammation. To improve the gut, again, the rules are simple: eat a lot of fiber every day – a lot of vegetables and fruits in their raw form. And it wouldn't hurt to supplement with an active pre- and probiotic to restore bacterial health.

Promote Metabolism and Suppress Inflammation.

That's what you can do to be a healthier you.

Friday, February 21, 2025

Seth Speaks: On Sleep

 

The body itself can be physically refreshed and rested

in much less time than 8 hours. After 5 hours

the muscles themselves yearn for activity.

This need is also a signal to awaken so that

unconscious material and dream information

be consciously assimilated.

N.O.P.R. Session 652 – March 28, 1973

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Dylan: Refusing to be a Leftist Prophet

 

The American birthright entails both the freedom and often times the necessity of making yourself up from scratch. Many of America’s most famous heroes were self-made men, from Benjamin Franklin to Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln. The same is true for the protagonists of America’s best-loved tales, from Huckleberry Finn to Jay Gatsby. Where Europeans defined themselves, both individually and collectively, through bloodlines and attachment to the soil, Americans defined themselves through a shared freedom from the past and an accompanying license to roam.

Where Americans were born and who their parents are has always been much less important than how they greeted the present moment, with one eye fixed on the road ahead and the other on the stars. Walt Whitman’s great “Song of Myself”, written in 1855 and unfolding over 52 stanzas, including accounts of sea battles and slavery, mentions not a single word about the speaker’s parents, or even what their names were.

Whitman’s Leaves of Grass, in which “Song of Myself” is contained, is the fountainhead of American poetics, particularly in the 20th century. Its distinctive echo can be heard everywhere after the Second World War, from the Beats to the novels of Saul Bellow, to the highbrow confessional poems of John Berryman and Frank O’Hara. In Rock and Roll music, Whitman’s greatest late 20th-century heir was undoubtedly Bob Dylan, who eerily reproduced both Whitman’s continent-spanning meter and his love of playful self-contradiction. Try reading nearly anything Whitman wrote in Dylan’s distinctive nasal tone, and the kinship will be plain.

James Mangold’s A Complete Unknown is merely the latest of a series of films that have attempted to grapple with the sometimes gratifying, often alienating mixture of freedom and vertigo inherent in the American birthright through the character of the man from nowhere. If the bright side of this character can be glimpsed in Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography, arguably the founding work of American literature, in Whitman’s all-embracing cosmic self, and in the rags-to-riches tales of Horatio Alger, the darkness that can accompany freedom from the past isn’t hard to find either. Natty Bumppo, the frontiersman-killer of James Fennimore Cooper’s Leatherstocking Tales, is the precursor to the ambivalent killer-hero of nearly every Western. Jay Gatsby’s invented self is ultimately more loyal and virtuous than the Long Island snobs who attend his glittering parties; it is also lie that ends in death.

The character of Bob Dylan, the boy who ostensibly learned to play music from circus performers passing through Hibbing, Minnesota and then re-named himself after the Welsh poet Dylan Thomas (a fact that Dylan strenuously denied for years before admitting to in his charming autobiography Chronicles) was more or less fully-fashioned even before the young performer set off to New York City to find Woody Guthrie and set the often drearily earnest world of American folk music on its ear. America has never really known Robert Zimmerman, the man who invented Bob Dylan. It has only known Bob Dylan.

So why did the 19-year-old Zimmerman choose to become Dylan? The answer, as he told 60 Minutes interviewer Ed Bradley 20 years ago, was because those are the rules of American selfhood. “You call yourself what you want to call yourself,” Dylan responded. “This is the land of the free.”

Dylan’s self-invented character of a punk Woody Guthrie, or as a rock and roll Walt Whitman, was wildly influential in his moment, for reasons that take a moment to recover. Meanwhile, his best songs have lost none of their immediacy. Working in the genre of “original folk music” that he more or less invented, he set the rules for rock songwriting for the next half century while writing two or three dozen major and minor classics that uniquely merited the awarding of a Nobel Prize for Literature, despite the formal and functional gulf that separates song lyrics from novels and poetry.

The rules of a “Dylan song” have remained remarkably consistent over time, bringing together the worlds of Woody Guthrie, hipster downtown New York, American roots music, the blues, country and western, into a kind of primordial soup that Dylan could dip his brush into at will; he created deceptively off-hand-seeming compositions governed by a rueful romanticism and a bullet-proof intelligence that twists and turns like a fish in order to avoid being caught.

It is also true that the alchemy by which singer-songwriters (itself an invention of the Sixties) do their thing tends to produce a period of startling peak creativity that lasts perhaps five years, often precluding the possibility of a second act. The Beatles produced all their great records within five years, as did the Rolling Stones. Jimi Hendrix’s entire career lasted four years, as did Kurt Cobain’s.

For artists who survive their creative peak, the reward is often an afterlife with lesser access to the divine. Part of Dylan’s spectacular self-awareness, which has only rarely faltered, is that he recognized the departure of the spirit much sooner than most; he never insisted that his newer songs were actually his best work. “I don’t know how I got to write those songs,” he admitted to Ed Bradley, of the classics he penned at his peak. “It’s a penetrating type of a magic, and I did it at one time.”

What’s left now, apart from the songs, is the distinctive voice, along with a repertoire of feints and dodges mixed with the occasional lip-curling hipster put-down. Onstage these days, the songwriter is often a gnomic shell, appearing to follow an internal logic by which he makes sense of himself to himself. Whatever those dialogues may be about, one suspects that the “real Bob Dylan” — whatever that means — of the singer’s youth was more sharper-edged and predatory than Timothée Chalamet’s cuddly, doe-eyed portrayal.

Still, Chalamet gets the look and the gestures right. He also nicely conveys the capacity for menace that the self-made man inherently contains. After all, if a person invents themselves from scratch, discarding their flesh-and-blood parents and origins in favor of their own self-invented mythos, then how much is that person likely to care about you? Not much. In his portrayal, Chalamet is notably faithful to the first and greatest portrayal of the character of Bob Dylan on film, which was by Bob Dylan himself, in D. A. Pennebaker’s documentary Don’t Look Back — which smartly allowed Dylan to do the work of explaining himself. By contrast, I’m Not There, an annoying film by the supremely surface-orientated director Todd Haynes, a master of a colder type of irony, swallows the Dylan mythology whole, as some kind of sacrament of modern American selfhood — without understanding or explaining why that should be true, apart from the multiplicity and seeming discontinuities in the pop star’s character, which Haynes implies should each be respected individually, like a family of distinguished drag queens.

What Haynes misses, and Pennebaker viscerally understood — and Mangold clearly intimates, without wanting to emphasize it too strongly — is that Dylan, in both his music and his persona, found himself at the center of the great intergenerational battle of the Sixties over the American gospel of individualism. For Dylan, the young man from Hibbing, the self that he invented out of his own materials was at once an entirely personal creation and at the same time represented his connection to a shared vision of America. He was a distinctly American individualist, just as Whitman was, and most great American-born artists are.

The materials he chose to work from were coded in ways that the young Dylan didn’t entirely recognize, though. Woody Guthrie wasn’t just a great American songwriter who spoke and sang in his own half-invented popular. The way that the young Robert Zimmerman might have imagined him. He was also a member of the Communist Party, which had its own uses for Guthrie’s persona and his art. The same was true of the parents of Dylan’s Greenwich Village girlfriend, Suze Rotolo, who Dylan credited with educating him about racial discrimination and labor politics and other subjects that the young singer-songwriter professed to “not know much about”. While the great folk archivist Alan Lomax, whose materials became Dylan’s, was not a Communist, he was undoubtedly a preservationist who saw folk music not as raw material to be mined and re-mixed by a future rock and roll Whitman, but the rightful property of the oppressed.

In other words, as Mangold does a good job of showing, the American Left, centered around the Communist Party, used folk music as a cultural banner, and as a political instrument — and they were right to feel that Bob Dylan had used them, and scorned them. Or to put it in a way more partial to Dylan, the young singer-songwriter took the folk tradition that they had co-opted in the service of their version of Cold War politics and put it back into the place it belonged, which was music. Dylan’s sin was never simply going electric. It was in putting art above politics.

In doing so, Dylan turned his back on the certainties of Leftist politics in order to more fully become what he wanted to be in the first place, which was himself. Aside from being a singer-songwriter, who that person was was entirely his own business. “I’m a song-and-dance man,” he once told a press conference at the height of the mania surrounding his decision to become a rock and roll artist and release “Like a Rolling Stone”, “Baby Blue” and “Visions of Johanna”, instead of additional helpings of Leadbelly covers. Neither Dylan nor the gathered reporters seemed able to disguise their glee at the proposition that he could simply make music, free of politics or the demands of being a prophet. “Elvis, I could easily see myself as him,” Dylan mused more than once. “But a prophet? Nah.”

It is only fair to Bob Dylan, the man, however self-made, to acknowledge how much the decision to break free from the heavily politicized aesthetics of the American Left, and the expectations and demands that came with it, must have cost him, both as a human being and as an artist. The assertion of the greater truth of his own art over the demands of the collective must have been, in many dimensions, a never-ending nightmare. Such was the price of the creative freedom that he sought and gained.

Was it worth it? For Dylan and for America, the answer is yes. Dylan’s legendary Basement Tapes with the Band, which surfaced as a lost corpus of songs from somewhere deep in the American imagination, continue to speak to us now, as much as his albums from his creative peak do. The fact that he maintained his place in the national imagination up through his 80s, speaks to a personal strength that is uniquely visible now, and makes it possible for his music to be heard by a new generation. In an era in which cookie-cutter Leftist politics similarly declares its pre-eminence over the aesthetic whims of mere artists, whose job is to bend the knee and crank out Shepherd Fairy-like propaganda in the interests of the Party, Dylan’s struggle again resonates.

Dylan himself would most likely have as little interest in being portrayed as a refusenik against the demands of proto-wokism as he would in continuing to sing worker’s protest songs. He was more interested in being Elvis. Yet, his example feels especially potent now for the obvious reason that we are once again living in an age when the threats to the integrity of the self, and to artistic expression, from both the Left and Right are very obviously real, and it takes real courage to say no.

Dylan’s triumph in that fight was total. No one has ever been cooler than Bob Dylan, and no one since Walt Whitman wrote better lyrics that encompassed more of the American spirit. The folkies who wanted Dylan to continue to play acoustic folk and demonstrate for CORE, and who saw albums like Blonde on Blonde or Blood on the Tracks as betrayals of the party line, are plainly ridiculous figures, even as their present-day kin are easy to spot.

For those who knew Dylan, and who in one way or another had reason to see themselves as his peers, Dylan continues to represent the highest mountain in their American songwriting. Jimmy Webb, the great American songwriter, told me once of meeting Dylan at a party, whereupon Dylan pulled out a guitar and played Jimmy his version of “Wichita Lineman”, a Jimmy Webb song that could have also perhaps have been written by Dylan. When he was done, he looked at Webb expectantly. “What, now I’m supposed to play you one of your songs?” Webb shot back.

It’s weird to think that at 83, Bob Dylan is as relevant as ever to the country that gave him the freedom to invent himself. But it’s plainly true. That’s because America remained his greatest inspiration, and the place in the mind where he was always most at home. As he explained it, obliquely, in a long poem he wrote upon the death of his hero:

"You can touch and twist
And turn two kinds of doorknobs
You can either go to the church of your choice
Or you can go to Brooklyn State Hospital
You’ll find God in the church of your choice
You’ll find Woody Guthrie in Brooklyn State Hospital

And though it’s only my opinion
I may be right or wrong
You’ll find them both
In the Grand Canyon
At sundown”

by David Samuels at unherd.com on January 14, 2025

The Five Laws of Human Stupidity that Rule the World

  In 1976, Professor Carlo M. Cipolla published a 60-page essay describing the fundamental laws of a force he perceived as the greatest exi...