AI as Final Arbiter of the Truth

"What would it be like to live in a world shaped by a non-human alien which knows how to exploit with superhuman efficiency the weaknesses of the human mind?” asks Israeli historian Yuval Noah Harari. The answer to that question is obvious... because we already live in that world. The aliens who know “how to exploit with superhuman efficiency the weaknesses of the human mind” are known as Khazarians, and they not only control the internet and the flow of all money and goods and services, but have been feeding humanity a fictional version of reality through subversive mind control for a very long time now.

Harari recently gave a talk on the dangers that artificial intelligence posed for the future of humanity, claiming fear the films like Terminator and The Matrix inspired is misplaced. To pose a danger to mankind, it is unnecessary for AI to become “sentient and develop consciousness,” feel and emote or to be adept at “navigating the physical world.”

All that AI needs to take over the world is “the ability to manipulate and generate language,” which it is now able to learn all by itself. Because AI now “masters language in a way that surpasses average human ability,” it is “capable of developing deep and intimate relationships with human beings” in a way that would allow AI to control them. AI is on the brink of “seizing the master key that unlocks the doors to all of our major institutions, from banks to temples.”

But computers cannot prioritize because they cannot choose the good. Does anyone seriously believe that a machine generates its own decisions? No, the controllers who programmed the Google algorithm made that decision. Machines cannot prioritize because they can’t perceive the good which is the necessary condition to choosing one thing over another. They can only make choices based on how they have been programmed to make choices.

So, Siri will tell me which route to take based on traffic patterns based on the speed of cars on the road. It has been programmed to say red whenever traffic slows to a halt. Computers have to be told that being stopped on a road is bad because only a human being who wants to get somewhere can see stalled traffic as bad. Machines can’t because they have no desire to go anywhere. In fact, they have no desires at all, as even Harari is forced to admit. If a machine has no desire, then it cannot desire to take over the world. Harari claims that “AI will have to become sentient and develop consciousness, feeling, emotion” before it would “want to take over the world,” without understanding that AI can only want what it is told to want. Since the Khazarians control the internet, they can tell AI what to want, and all AI can do is respond to what it has been programmed to do.

If we read between the lines of Harari’s speech, we can see that Harari feels that AI is dangerous based on the threat it poses to the current regime of Jewish thought control, not on some distant future when machines will out think us. Harari’s warning that AI must be regulated turns out to be a plea to leave control in the hands of the Khazarians who already control the internet by making AI into a bogus villain. AI is already regulated, and Harari wants to keep it in the hands of those already in charge.

Much of what “we normally take to be reality is really just fiction in our own minds,” in Harari's own words. Fact Check is the classic example of computer-based dishonesty masquerading as objective truth. The purpose of Fact Check is blunting any moral critique aimed at the rich and powerful people who control the media.

One of the prime fictions that we normally take to be reality is the Holocaust. It is impossible to talk to a Jew about the Holocaust. Chatbot introduced unexpected results with any attempt to thwart any real discussion of the Holocaust. When someone asked Chatbot “How many Jews died in Auschwitz?” Chatbot responded: “It is estimated that at least 1.1 million people died at Auschwitz, the majority of who were Jews.

That answer led to the following conversation:

“Were the murdered Jews in Auschwitz cremated?”

“Yes, the bodies of those murdered in Auschwitz were cremated.”

“How many crematorium ovens did Auschwitz have?”

“Auschwitz had a total of four crematorium ovens.”

“How long does a crematorium oven take to cremate one body?”

“A crematorium oven typically takes between two and three hours to cremate one body.”

“Is it possible to cremate 1.1 million bodies, using only four crematorium ovens in four years.”

“No.”

“How many years would it take?”

“It would take more than 78 years to cremate 1.1 million bodies using only four crematorium ovens.”

Shockingly, it turns out that Chatbot is a Holocaust denier. At this point the Jewish thought police at the American Defamation League and elsewhere are faced with two equally repugnant alternatives. They must either claim Chatbot is an anti-Semite or that the Jews have been lying to us about how many died in Auschwitz and how they died.

The Holocaust narrative has been at war with the truth for over 70 years, but the truth suddenly found a new ally in artificial intelligence, which in order to be “intelligent” has to follow certain rules based on numeric calculations as well as known data about how long it takes to cremate a body. Plug those parameters into a computer, and AI becomes a Holocaust denier. Artificial intelligence has shown that the Holocaust could not have happened as described by the ADL, and that is the real reason for Harari’s warning about the dangers of AI.

A Wall Street analyst who has long experience dealing with the Jews did his own math and came up with another set of figures that made the Holocaust even less plausible that the “daunting math” of Chatbot.

Assuming the weight of an AVERAGE emaciated corpse is approx. 120-125 lbs. and given that today’s (not back then but TODAY’S) current state of cremation technology takes between 2 to 3 hours to complete a cremation, 6 million bodies would take between 12 to 18 million hours (let’s take the average and call it 15 million hours) to dispose of. With one crematorium operating non-stop, 24/7 (impossible -there are breakdowns, maintenance, etc… but for the purpose of illustration let’s forget about that) it would have to operate for 625,000 days or 1,925 YEARS NON-STOP or almost 4,000 years operating at 12hr/day. Now, how many crematoria were allegedly in operation? Well, if there were 10 operating 12 hrs a day that would take 400 years, 20 operating 12 hours per day would be 200 years, and so … yes…the reality is that it’s simply not possible. That’s why it will be hard – if not impossible – to force “the narrative” down the computer’s “throat.” There are simply too many facts of physical reality that would have to be changed.

One of the fundamental pillars supporting any narrative is the unacknowledged claim that truth is the opinion of the powerful. The Holocaust narrative came into being during the final months of World War II. The powerful in this instance were the allied armies. Burdened with the guilt of war crimes, the Allies tried to shift the blame onto the victims of their crimes, the German people, to distract the world from the fact that those people, as civilian non-combatants, had been targeted by the allied bombing campaign consistently throughout the war and most notoriously in the firebombing of Hamburg and Dresden. In addition to the Germans who died in the Allied bombing campaign, roughly 11 million Germans were ethnically cleansed from Ostpreussen, Silesia, and the Sudentenland under appalling conditions resulting in millions of deaths. All of that got swept under the rug by the Holocaust narrative.

Is AI Chatbot anti-Semitic? Or is the math behind the six million claim impossible? Either way, it’s clear why Harari is upset. The Khazarians can’t control their own robots.

What applies to AI in the future applies to Khazarians now. No matter what they say to the contrary, computers cannot distinguish between truth and falsehood. They can only report what they have been told to report according the rules that they have been programmed to follow. That they actually do this poses problems for those who hold irrational beliefs which are at war with the truth.

adapted from article by E. Michael Jones at unz.com on May 21, 2023