Redefining the Illusions of History and Time

 

We're going to get into defining time and the rest of our physical reality in different ways as we go forward, and that will indeed involve redefining our past in order to proceed to what we conceive of as a future. And this is because we're under attack. Humanity is being attacked. Has been. It's been escalated to the point where if you looked at it a particular way you can see the battles in what we used to think of as the ancient past, trying to kill off vast quantities of humans, and then it morphs all the way through the period of Genghis Khan (who was actually the Khan of Tartaria, the King of Tartaria).

In any event, though, so we get up to modern warfare, the First World War, the Spanish-American War and so on, and we're talking about vast mass movements, and mostly the people involved in the mass movements are totally ignorant of what's going on, and only see a little bit of the whole. And we've been being engineered into these giant slaughters. The Spanish flu came out along with all of these other attacks on humanity as a whole... a part of the depopulation agenda... and now they're rushing it forward.

So, in rushing it forward, we victims of it have to ask why. One possible reason in the complexity that presents itself is that humanity is actually waking up... that the Internet has allowed some free minds to cross-pollinate with other minds and induce those minds to be more free in their thoughts... more free of the restriction that's been laid on us by our enemy that is currently trying to chemtrail us out of existence and so on. And this is a complexity because if you go and suddenly wake up a normie and they see the chemtrails, a couple of them that I've dealt with actually say, no, I don't want to know about that. I don't want to know. Others were just flabbergasted. They never ever really looked up and understood what was happening. And then they start asking questions, right? And the first thing that they'll do is they'll start hitting all these other parts of the complexity that our enemy, the enemy that is trying to make us extinct, has put out there.

So they think in terms of complexity, this enemy, alright? And so they put out layer upon layer upon layer of deception over their apparent actions. So, you can find chemtrails and then you say, who's doing this evil thing? And then you ask, why is it being done? And then, what effect does it have on us?

And so when you go to look at the who, you run into all these layers, none of which are really meaningful. Yes, there's weather modification companies, and many of those are useful idiots. They have no idea as to the grander scheme in which they're participating.

Anyway, so there's layers of deception and misdirection that are applied on everything as you get into this understanding. But the ontology, I believe, wants to support humanity and wants to give us an awareness of this such that we can fight back and overcome it. I think it wants our success. And so I'm proceeding on that basic principle that the ontology is supporting me as a human, and thus all humans are also supported, because of the ontology and the way it works... and that the ontology will provide me what I need as I go along, sort of like as a character in a video game. You don't expect the player up there to just leave you hanging, right? They're there to motivate you and keep moving and stuff. And so that's a good analogy for where we're at.

So we're redefining everything and we have to keep this attitude. It's much more important that we not settle on a new definition, that instead the most important aspect of that is to keep open this idea of uncertainty... that you don't really know... that you think you have some hints that point you at particular things, but you can't really see the larger aspect of things.

And so, the scientific view of consciousness, life, and computers by the guy who came up with the silicon chip based on activating crystals at a micro level is that there is a real truism that you can never describe... none of the physicists in the world ever, ever, ever will be able to describe consciousness with mathematics in a physical sense... because it's not physical.

But that's not the real reason they can't do it... because you can describe all kinds of non-physical things with mathematics, but the real reason you can't describe consciousness with mathematics is because mathematics derives from consciousness. And being within consciousness, it's not possible for it to see consciousness from the outside and provide an accurate description. And that's where humans are, okay? So we are within the complexity of the ontology. And so we can only describe the ontology from looking up, so to speak.

And so we'll see the complexity from the inside in a way. And we'll never be able to see the complexity from the grander, greater view. Accepting that, there's still things that we can determine and conclusions that we can make that are both valid and practical and useful to us.

Knowing that, there's going to be some things we can determine just from the presentation of universe itself. So the idea of quantum computers and the idea of quantum mechanics involves this thing that this guy Max Planck came up with, which was the idea of the smallest possible action, the smallest possible movement or dynamism of energy involved, called the Planck minimum. It's the minimal energy expenditure that's required to get any kind of an action. That also extends into perception and understanding.

And so we can define qualia, which is a definition of a quantum attribute, as the minimum amount of energy or action or expression that is required to get across a concept. And so, like all quantum things, you can understand that qualia build a complexity upon themselves, just as quantum builds a complexity upon itself to present us with our three-dimensional material reality.

So, basically, here's the whole encapsulation - it comes down to this - scientists used to think that atoms made up everything and that atoms were little solid balls. And now they don't think they're little solid balls; they think they're an illusion presented by frequencies of energy moving very fast. That's the first part of it. Scientists no longer believe that atoms are little solid balls... so relativistic rational materialism is gone. And they now think that it's all energy, and they can't figure out a whole lot about it, but it's good because that means there's so much more to discover, and that you may be able to manipulate at a greater level. Thus, we have qubits and stuff like that.

So basically, our physics is in its infancy. If we look at our own history, then we're in our own infancy. We've been discussing this kind of stuff since BC, so we ought to be way more advanced, right? Why were there the Dark Ages? Why didn't people think in that period of time? Anyway, so much evidence that our history as presented to us is all lies.

If you start looking, you start seeing that all of our history is lies and it's all obscuring something else. And at the same time, we're under assault and someone's trying to kill us off in probably two more generations. So, why would there be political aggression in America against an idea of a healthy population? You can bitch and moan about various aspects of the definition of health, but why are you against MAHA and a healthy population?

On the face of it, we're now coming up to this point where even our own actions within the woo community, examined from this viewpoint of where we are within the complexity itself, are part of the ontology telling us stuff.

Your own actions, the things that you do, should be examined with the idea that they're being prompted by a greater ontology. Usually we'll always take the most minimal expenditure of energy in our actions. Examining our own actions in the woo community, we see that we're waking up to greater degrees, and we see it spreading throughout the rest of humanity, especially the Internet-connected humanity.

So here we are as the woo people starting to become like complexity scientists by studying their own consciousness, applying that study to their own actions, and getting both a feedback and a feed-forward loop going relative to the emergence out of the event stream.

This is a lead-in to the sci-fi world... a necessary part. In this part of sci-fi world, for the next years or so, it is a period of redefinition. We're in the midst of the destruction phase or the chaos phase that induces the destruction phase. And so in the next years, we're in the destruction phase, but it's not as you might think, because it's not like we're going to go and blow everything up. We've been doing that at their behest anyway. We've been destroying Tartaria!!! (If you get on X and just look up Tartaria, you're going to be blown away.)

So this year of destruction is the destruction of the illusion, and then in these next years we'll see this incredible outpouring of creativity as humanity starts in on this innovation boom that is just going to be nonstop and continuous for probably thousands of years, especially relative to the Kali Yugas, where we're at now.

Anyway, in this destruction phase, we're going to be redefining everything. And so, in my opinion, the way to approach this is we enter into the time zone where we're actually going to be, redefining what does time mean and discovering that there is no future. There is only the continuous event stream and the flow of karma or the generation of karma by our actions that come back to us in this feedback and feed-forward loop as part of consciousness.

As we get into that we can redefine all of our concepts of reality, all of our base concepts and fit all the pieces in a lot better form. Because when you approach it from an ontological viewpoint, you don't have to assemble all of the grit to have everything make sense. You have everything make sense and then you see how that applies to the grit. And so it's a much easier way to do science, in my opinion.

Anyway, so physics is truly in its infancy, and it's coming into the destruction phase where we'll do away with the idea of physics, and we're going to do away with the old idea of psychism.

Okay, so the real ancients, going back (take about a thousand years out of there) a thousand years and we'll be talking about the real philosophers who sat around and initiated the beginning of mathematics and considered manifesting reality as something that emanated from the psychic aspects of our personalities and our being. And so they knew it to be a projection at some level.

Now, this begs so many questions, throws so many questions at us, right? Why were these individuals in that period of time pondering such fundamental aspects of reality and yet living among the pyramids and all of these ancient structures - Angkor Wat, Gobekli Tepe, and all of these places?

It would seem, one might conclude, that our modern humanity was somehow placed in a destroyed world. And we find some evidence of that with the idea of the mud flood, especially relative to Tartaria. We find some other evidence in the great valleys in India where there's remnants of civilizations that lasted a thousand years. They had no weapons. And all the houses were basically the same size. It appeared to be an egalitarian society. But there's these weird oddities, again, that suggest that modern humans, our current form, was not part of that past.

And so, if we look at Tartaria, at the Tartarian buildings, we find that they had free energy. They apparently harvested what we would think of as static electromagnetic or the electromagnetic-based frequencies out of the atmosphere and conducted them through the ground and took it off for their heating and cooling needs. But here's the thing... Tartarian buildings, insofar as we can discover, have no bathrooms, no plumbing, no running water, no kitchens. There was no food preservation areas that can be discerned from the examination of these buildings now. And it is not as though the destruction of the buildings, because we still have a number of them, especially in India and places outside the reach of the western republics, but when you go and look at them, they're quite odd. They're very fascinating. They have, especially in India, some fantastic aspects and attributes to them, and theoretically are made out of stone, although if you really look at it, it appears to be formed of a polymer concrete kind of a thing, extruded or something like 3D printing, or something like that.

And so there's all of these megalithic structures we can't duplicate now, and it goes on and on and on to the point that you're actually probably close to millions of examples that humans did not evolve as the evolutionists and the Darwinianists would have us understand.

And then you start asking questions about these simple pieces of evidence that the complexity provides you... and the ontology provides us with these pyramids we can't explain. The further we investigate into them, the more we discover that we were mistaken initially. Now we are discovering that they may be power plants, but we don't really know what kind of power or what the point was. You can speculate to a certain point, but now that we're starting to become more awakened in a general sense, and with the woo spreading, we are beginning to see it differently, in large part thanks to the Internet.

We talk about the Internet changing people, but not as thinking of it as a medium of added complexity. You could think of it as altering our economic situation, which it did, bringing in just-in-time deliveries, which it did, etc., etc. But those are not... the most profound, nor the end result, nor the ultimate effect. Another yet much more profound effect was the impact of the Internet on human consciousness and the spread of ideas.

Nothing is more powerful than an idea. In fact, communism is not a thing. Communism is an ideology, an ID-ology, it's a worship of the of an idea. So, you know, all it takes is an idea and you can transform humanity. Thus you see aspects of that transformation in how our enemy is using parts of humanity to depopulate and kill off the rest of humanity. And one must ask, if you're thinking about it, why should this occur? How did they do that? What were the mechanisms that allowed them to do this? Was it entirely social? Was it electromagnetic?

That's when you start noticing weird associations of things like the first spread of transcontinental telegraph lines being exactly coincident with the first outbreak of the flu. And so then you look at the spread of other diseases and you see how indeed most of these things are induced.

So the ontology would prefer us to be healthy, but our enemies, labeled as the demiurge, disincarnate evil that doesn't like humanity, would have us succumb to all of these things, right? The demiurge would have us go away. And it appears that the demiurge right now is running the chem-trail planes, operating big pharma, big food, big government.

The good news is that the battle is becoming evident, people are becoming aware and awake, and the ontology is the driving force of that. So we have the ontology versus the demiurge, so at one level humanity is just involved in yet another proxy war, but maybe we're getting closer to the actual point of manipulation from the enemy through humanity against us because a lot of that does seem to be engineered by the Israelis and going back through them through Jewish lineage.

Of course, you can't blame the Jews for not seeing it that way because they're inside it. They are great mathematicians, but they'll never be able to describe consciousness because the mathematics is within and derives from consciousness. And so we'll never have a grand enough vision, so to speak, to be able to include consciousness in its calculations.

So this is where we're at at this stage. This is the time zone. We're going to be redefining time, redefining our history, destroying much of the illusions of our history that have been laid upon us.

This is going to be very traumatic for people. That level of trauma is going to emerge this summer. It's going to hit us this next month - July. Personally, I don't expect, and I'm not really worried about nuclear war or a Third World War or any of that. There is a possibility we'll have a nuclear incident. That would be the termination point of an Israeli mistake. If we do have that and the Israelis cause something like, say, nuclear pollution of the Pacific Ocean all the way down to Australia and into a great deal of Asia... if that occurs that's the end of the war right there. Nobody would deal with Israel in any way, shape, or form thereafter. Their electricity systems would get shut off; nobody will deliver oil to them; they won't sell them food, any of this. I see that the ontology is pushing Trump, Putin, even Xi, into a situation to derail that, right now.

And this may indeed be all part of the great plan that was discussed in the Q documents. So we'll see. We'll see how it emerges. It's not going to be a big thing, right? There's going to be lots of drama and some level of trauma in between, and then, in my opinion, it will fade away as we get into these larger issues that will emerge from it.

Now, remember, even success at this level, so even Trump the Peacemaker emerging out of the theater of Trump the Warrior, is going to have big consequences at emotional levels in July. And then we'll have a slight sag in August, and we'll be back into it again in September. And so if one wanted to step way back and look inward on the complexity and the duration of things happening, one could postulate that over July we will have this (I don't want to say euphoria) building tension that will be more on the happy side than on the negative side. The building tension levels are indeterminate. How we react to them as humans is up to us.

It can end good or bad. That's a separate issue entirely. But I think in September and October and November we're going to get into this really rough period in the time zone where a lot of people have to face a hard wakeup call. So there will be two reactions, two very broad camps of reaction. One set of reaction is going to come from those people that are involved where they'll have some level of awareness of their own involvement and they won't feel very good about that. So there'll be that sort of a reaction. I don't know exactly, but there will be a big backlash within that group because they're emotionality is very heightened by their service to the demiurge. They will have this somewhat heightened level of emotional backlash. So it wouldn't surprise me to see that kind of a backlash against their former masters in terms of, you know, the Vax or something. That sort of thing.

Then there's going to be the other group that's going to be coming to awareness of the enemy and you're going to see all different kinds of attacks on humanity and you're going to see all different kinds of these responses within this much larger group that will be redirecting people into a religious response.

That's going to be sort of temporary. It'll be problematic and frothy. It'll have a lot of emotionality involved. It'll extend through until January or February of next year as part of our time zone. Because within the big religious response there's going to be a level of degradation as the emergence of an ontological paradigm within science starts to affect the religions themselves.

Religion does not stand alone. It did sort of stand alone when science was in its nascent form, as basically physical philosophy, you know, a philosophical description of our physical reality. And then eventually that took over and started supporting and changed religions. And so religions can be expected to change as the scientific paradigm in which they exist changes. That scientific paradigm is now changing as we see from more and more books, going to various levels of, using various words to describe the ontology.

So all of these books are the Gritologists using gritology language to try and describe consciousness. And so that's why they flail around. That's why as mathematicians they can't describe consciousness. Their language is inadequate because they are starting from a gritology viewpoint. And all of that is in the process of changing. So we'll see more books like that come on out.

We'll see more views of the ontology and things being presented by the gritologists from an ontological perspective forward. It'll be tainted because they're still gritologists, because they're still speaking with a Gritology paradigm imposed on their mind, but even they are breaking free of it. In this process of the science breaking free, it will affect the religions.

In the process of the religions being affected there will be a lot of turmoil. This goes back to the forecasts in the old Alta reports of the battles in the megachurches. It didn't define the battles, that is to say the philosophical nature of why the churches were splitting up and and having battles within them, but it just noted it as an example of the building tension.

And so we're at that period now. Out of this period is going to emerge, over these next years, in a very solid way, an entirely different understanding of our reality. That will allow us to engineer relatively cool stuff, like anti-gravity vehicles. But, note that in these next years it will be more accepted that we are indeed now in this period of recognizing that we're under attack, recognizing that we as a species have an enemy that is attempting to make us all extinct within the next two generations.

This is the great battle. And I was promised a chance to die in this great battle. I think I see this great battle shaping up. And it's not World War III, right? That's like the fake wars. It's all orchestrated so in that sense it is fake. It's all theater. There is a reason for the theater. The woo people can skip that reason because that reason is to wake up the normies, to wake up humanity in an organized way, at a slow enough pace that they're not going to freak and revert to frantic monkeyness, right? It won't allow monkey mind to take over.

Anyway, so that's where we're at now. We're coming to a period of time where the events and everybody waking up is going to rush us into things. And maybe that'll start in July.

July certainly is an elevated level of tension, but that elevated tension is not related to the emergence of World War III. Indeed, there is a huge amount of threats of World War III, but that war does not, in my opinion, show up in any of the data sets or any of the tension levels that are expressed in the charts I've put out. I think other sets of... upsetting and disruptive events are going to emerge and we'll all have to respond to them and make decisions and then go on and start more karma.

Anyway guys, take pity on the normies. You're going to say Tartaria and they're going to say, huh?

from the substack of Clif High on June 21, 2025