The
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and President of the Impeachment
Trial, John Roberts, stepped in it big time yesterday when Senator
Rand Paul petitioned the justice to ask the following question:
“Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President, are you aware that
House Intelligence Committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close
relationship with Eric Ciaramella when at the National Security
Council together, and are you aware and how do you respond to reports
that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching
the President before there were formal House impeachment
proceedings?” Justice Roberts, who was outside his authority to do
so, refused to read the question. Why? Because, without any
authority, he said he would not read questions that reveal the name
of the whistleblower. And so, by refusing to read this question,
this specific name, Roberts confirmed the whistleblower is, indeed,
one Eric Ciaramella (which everyone knows anyway).
Not
amused with Roberts' obviously biased overreaching response, Senator
Paul responded: “My question is not about a “whistleblower” as
I have no independent information on his identity. My question is
about the actions of known Obama partisans within the NSC and House
staff and how they are reported to have conspired before impeachment
proceedings had even begun. [A]nd are you aware and how do you
respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together
to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house
impeachment proceedings?”
This
is just too good of a story to let slip away without comment. The
underlying drama of this story, which is something that will never
likely see print in the New York Times or the Washington Post, is at
the core of what the political kerfuffle the past three years has
been all about. Whichever side of the fence you sit on, stick with
me on this, because if little ole me has been able to connect the
dots with a bit of internet investigation, then I guaran-damn-tee you
that the President, his Attorney General, and the intelligence
apparatus has known this for some time now. And if all of this is
factual, even if it is just a summary tip of the iceberg, and if this
matter has already been largely discovered through official
investigations, then the President was absolutely and unequivocally
within his authority to do diligence on the Biden matter in Ukraine.
Sometimes
it is difficult to determine where reality departs from the smoke and
mirrors of political combat, but I believe Senator Paul was
attempting to flush out the matter into public view with his
petitioned inquiry that was denied by Justice Roberts. Contrary to
appearances, the President and those in the know in Congress actually
wanted a plethora of witnesses to testify, while the Democrat House
managers were walking a fine line to avoid any further questioning of
certain clandestine characters they wish to remain sequestered.
There is so much involved here that it was prudent to shut down the
impeachment proceedings so as not to consume the Senate's time for an
unforeseeable number of months ongoing, when all of this will
ultimately be adjudicated through the justice system during the next
months to years, without misdirecting Congress' focus from the
people's business.
So why
are the Democrats hiding Eric Ciaramella? Why is this man whose name
must not be spoken such a pivotal figure in all of this?
In
February 2014, there was a violent coup d'etat in Ukraine in which
President Yanukovych was ousted and the United States succeeded in
getting rid of another independently elected President of a foreign
government. There was a horrific massacre in the main square of the
capital Kiev where 100 people were killed. Strategically positioned
snipers (who were Georgians under the control of globalist
Shaakasvili) indiscriminately shot protesters and police alike in the
streets from the windows of tall buildings surrounding the square.
The coup was entirely organized at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, under
the supervision of Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland at
the direction of CIA Director John Brennan. It was CIA operative
Eric Ciaramella, who spoke both Ukrainian and Russian fluently, who
hired the snipers.
It was
two months following the coup in early May 2014, that Hunter Biden
was put on the board of Burisma, while Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul
Pelosi, was put on the board of another Ukraine energy company. It
was at the same time that John Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz,
ended his business relationship with Hunter Biden after turning down
a similar offer that he perceived as being just too shady. (Biden
and Heinz were at that time the co-owners of the private equity firm
Rosemont Seneca Partners, where Heinz’ college roommate, Devon
Archer, was a managing partner, also joining Biden on the board of
Burisma.)
Following
the coup, Biden traveled to Ukraine twelve times with his son Biden
on Air Force Two, at taxpayer expense. Adam Schiff traveled to
Ukraine multiple times with Eric Ciaramella. Until the Ukraine
government that was friendly to the Russians was removed in the coup,
there were no financial reimbursements made to American politicians.
Once the CIA gone rogue installed new cooperative leadership that
would kick back funds, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Adam
Schiff, John McCain, and others in government began to see a
percentage coming back to them whenever the American Congress
allocated supportive funds to the new government.
These
people are criminals. The deaths of a hundred Ukrainians is on them.
The overthrow of the former government was for the sole purpose of
enriching American politicians. That has been how foreign policy has
been conducted during the nation building years of George Bush and
Barack Obama. These same mercenary forces have been used again and
again throughout the world and domestically to achieve results
through rogue violence – think Las Vegas.
Donald
Trump is stopping the violence and the as well as the lucrative gravy
train with his different non-interventionalist approach to foreign
policy. Those who have been benefiting have not only had their
illicit income halted, but they have been found out and are soon to
be held accountable by the Justice Department. Qanon has posted many
times that “those who scream the loudest have the most to lose” -
think Brennan, Nuland, Schiff, Biden, Kerry, and Pelosi. I think of
a whole lot more, most of all the Clintons. Who else is involved?
And how complicit is Obama? There is likely a whole rat's nest of
evil that is on track to be rooted out. The President has voiced
publicly that he knows all about it. AG Barr knows all about it, and
directed official inquiry into the matter some time ago.
No
wonder the Dems want everyone to stay far away from Eric Ciaramella.
The truth always finds its way into the light. When it does, we can
expect some large heads to roll.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.