I had
a discussion with a friend who argued that if one cannot
empirically observe or measure something, then it doesn't exist. In
his linear Newtonian way of looking at the world, he was excluding
the entire existence of the unseen world from what we acknowledge as
real, which I perceive as the matrix behind the entire nature and
mechanics of the Universe that we claim to scientifically know. The
current ruling paradigm of scientific materialism has established
itself as the conclusive arbiter of what is real and true, such that
if something is deemed unscientific it becomes at best questionable
and at worst something illegal or even punishable by law. The defenders of scientific dogma too often see
their conclusions as absolute, infallible, and unquestionable.
This
scientific paradigm that defines the truths we live by is based on
four dominant tenets that are deemed indisputable facts. First, the
physical world we can measure is all there is. Second, that nature
favors the strongest and the fittest will prevail. Third,
that we are victims of our biological inheritance and the most that
we can hope for is that science finds a way to compensate for our
inherent flaws and frailties. And fourth, that life is essentially
random and without guiding purpose. With these tenets as our
foundation, it is clear how we have arrived at a point where money,
material goods, and machinery are more valuable than things unseen.
Science
is now our religion, but it wasn't always the arbiter of truth.
Before Darwin sailed in the Beagle, it was the Church that served as
the guiding paradigm of all things true. The truth was different
then. The tenets of the Church were essentially that we were on this
Earth only by divine intervention, put here to live out a morality drama and obey the Word of God – or else. And before that
the truth was that we came from chaos, here only to please the whimsy
of mischievous gods that one had better not anger or offend.
Like
the adherents of science today, the Church positioned itself as the
sole source of civilization's knowledge. The Church was able to control
the power of that knowledge by controlling education, amassing vast
wealth and great influence in the process, not unlike defenders of
science today. As the mighty intercessor between God and the King,
the Church was able to secure the arm of the law to secure its
dominion. In time, with its intoxication with power and authority,
the Church's original mission of helping humanity took a back seat to
the more immediate mission of helping itself. Like science today, its
precarious power and authority rested solely upon the fragile
foundation that its knowledge represented absolute truth.
But
nothing lasts forever – not even truth - and the Church was
inevitably challenged as followers arrived at new truths. The bloody
Inquisition and the Renaissance laid a path for science to supplant
the old paradigm with its new truths. And like the Church, the
things that pass for truth in our mass consciousness today, as defined
by the scientific paradigm, will pass as well. This is already
happening under the weight of its own inquiry. The spirit of science
is alive and well. Scientists thinking outside the defined
parameters of scientific limitation are creating unexpected upheavals at
the leading edges of science. It is their new findings that are
dramatically rewriting the way we see the world. Look around and we
see we are in the throes of revolution. The defenders of the old
scientific dogma have dug in to hold onto a paradigm that is quickly
slipping away. Like the Church, it is those who profit from obsolete
dogma that most resist the change of long held cherished beliefs.
Science can no longer defend its disappearing dogma by saying “it
is true because we say it is.”
A new
paradigm of holism that includes unseen things is emerging. There is
much, much more to the universe than just the things we can observe
and measure. Matter does not matter as much as the unseen matrix
behind it. We are not alone. We share a universe that is teaming
with all manner of conscious beings. Darwin's evolutionary
hypothesis, in part, is but one of many working hypotheses. We are not victims
of genetics, but have full control over our biological expression at
all times merely by changing the way we perceive the world we
interact with. We are not here by chance but because of a driving
overarching purpose. Every aspect of life has meaning, and like our
scientific understanding of energy, that which makes us alive cannot
be destroyed and is eternal. These are the truths we will come to
know and believe and trust as we transition into a new paradigm, a
new era, now, right in front of our eyes.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.