The Hidden Unpublished Teachings of Seth

 

What I'm about to share with you isn't conspiracy theory. It suppressed metaphysics. Across the 21 years of Seth Sessions, from 1963 until Jane's death in 1984, there are dozens, maybe hundreds of sessions that were deliberately withheld from publication... not because they were false, not because they contradicted the published material, but because they threatened something far more fundamental... the very pillars that consensus reality stands on.

The publishers balked. The editors worried about lawsuits, about backlash, about being accused of promoting dangerous ideas. Even Jane herself hesitated, feeling the crushing weight of concepts that could, in her words, shatter a reader's sanity, if delivered without proper preparation. She understood what she was channeling, wasn't just advanced spirituality, it was civilizational dynamite.

Think about what the published Seth material already accomplished. The books Seth Speaks and The Nature of Personal Reality introduced radical concepts - you create your own reality, reincarnation isn't linear, consciousness creates matter. These ideas alone spawned an entire New Age movement, influenced millions, and fundamentally shifted how Western culture thinks about reality.

That was the safe material... the teachings they allowed to be printed. But what about the ideas that couldn't be spoken aloud? …. the sessions marked too intense, too destabilizing, not for general audiences. What happens when you read the words that made even the metaphysical publishers nervous?

What happens is that control structures collapse. The fear of death industry crumbles. The victim oppressor narratives that fuel entire political movements lose their foundation. The therapy industrial complex that promises healing after 20 years of weekly sessions suddenly has no ground to stand on.

Because these hidden teachings don't just suggest you have power, they demonstrate that you've always had complete authority over your reality, including the parts you thought happened to you.

In this post you're going to encounter ideas that have been deliberately kept from mass consciousness for half a century... not because they're complicated (Seth's explanations are remarkably clear), not because they require special intelligence to grasp, but because they're dangerous... dangerous to systems that profit from your sense of powerlessness... dangerous to institutions built on the assumption that you're a victim of circumstances beyond your control... dangerous to anyone who is invested in the story, that life is something that happens to you rather than through you.

The material that made it into the published books was radical enough to change lives. But the unpublished material that stayed in the archives is civilization shifting... the kind of knowledge that once you truly understand it, makes it impossible to live the same way ever again.

Once you really get what Seth was saying in those shelved sessions, there's no going back. Excuses evaporate. Your victim stories collapse. You're left standing in the center of your own reality, holding the paintbrush, staring at the canvas, and that terrifies people... which is exactly why it remained hidden.

Let's open the vault.

You create your own reality became Seth's most famous phrase, endlessly quoted, printed on coffee mugs and motivational posters, watered down into vision boards and manifestation workshops. The New Age movement grabbed onto it, turned it into affirmations and intention setting rituals, and completely missed the most radical part of what Seth was actually saying. But you don't just create your current circumstances, you don't just attract your relationships or manifest your income level... according to the suppressed sessions, particularly from the Early Sessions, Book 9, and unpublished material from 1970 through 1972, you create something far more fundamental... you create the decision to be born. And you are creating... right now... the timing and manner of your own death. And you're creating this present moment from outside time itself.

Let's unpack this because this is where Seth's teaching becomes almost unbearably radical. Your entity, Seth's term for your larger self, the multi-dimensional consciousness that you're a focused extension of, exists in a state where past, present, and future are simultaneous. From that vantage point, what we experience as linear time is more like a landscape you can view all at once. And from that perspective, from that timeless awareness, you are right now designing the life you believe you're living through.

Think about that. The birth you think happened decades ago... your entity is creating it now in this eternal present, retroactively choosing which version of your childhood to solidify as real based on your current beliefs.

The death you fear in some distant future, you're going to create it when you're ready from this same timeless space, selecting the exit that best completes the story you came here to tell. In one of the suppressed 1971 sessions, Seth puts it this way (and I'm paraphrasing from the archive notes)...

The personality you think of as you is making moment-by-moment choices about which past to remember, which future to anticipate, and which present to experience. But your entity is simultaneously orchestrating all of it, weaving probabilities together into the particular pattern you call your life.

You're not locked into any version of your past... because you're creating it now. You can literally change it by changing your beliefs in the present.

Not time travel in the science fiction sense, not rewriting history, but probability selection. Every moment, infinite versions of your past exist as probable realities. The childhood where your father was distant and critical, that's one probability. But there's also a probability where your father was present and loving. Where the same events happened but with different emotional tones, different meanings, different outcomes.

As you shift your beliefs now, you shift which probability becomes real for you. You're not changing what happened. You're changing your relationship to what happened, which literally shifts you into a different probable version of your history.

Seth describes this as changing the past by changing your vibrational relationship to it. And here's the disturbing beauty of it... Evidence in your present reality will shift to match. Old photographs will seem different. Memories will surface that you'd forgotten. Other people's recollections will mysteriously align with your new version... because you're not convincing yourself of a lie... you're selecting a different truth from the infinite probabilities that all actually exist.

Why was this teaching suppressed? Because it obliterates victimhood at its root. If you created everything, including the abuse, the betrayal, the illness, the poverty, then the entire trauma industry collapses. The therapy model that keeps you processing the same wounds for decades losses its foundation. The political movements built on oppressor and oppressed dynamics suddenly have no ground to stand on. The pharmaceutical companies selling anti-depressants to people convinced their brains are broken... what happens when those people realize they're creating their brain chemistry moment by moment through belief?

Let me be clear. I'm not dismissing suffering. Pain is real. Trauma has impact. But Seth is relocating the origin point from 'the world did this to me and I'm forever damaged' to 'I am at the entity level experiencing what I chose to explore and I can choose differently'.

In the suppressed material, Seth addresses this directly, acknowledging how disturbing this teaching is. He says something like, "The ego resists this understanding because it threatens its entire narrative of itself as victim or hero of a story written by external forces”. But your entity chose this incarnation with full knowledge of its challenges, not as punishment, but as curriculum.

Here's what this means for you practically.

You can start experimenting with probability selection right now. Take one limiting belief you hold about your past. Maybe I've always been shy or I was never good at relationships or my family never supported me. Now ask yourself, is there a probable version of my past where that wasn't true? Can I find even one memory that contradicts this belief?

When you find it, and you will if you look, then focus on it. Amplify it. Write about it. Tell that version of your history to yourself until it feels more real than the old version. Watch what happens.

New memories will surface. Your present behavior will shift. Other people will start treating you differently because you're literally occupying a different probability... and they're responding to the version of you that exists in that probability.

This isn't positive thinking. This isn't affirmations. This is consciousness selecting which thread of reality to follow moment by moment... and the universe, because it's made of consciousness, conforming to your selection.

Seth's most chilling implication in these suppressed sessions is perhaps that if you can re-author your past, you can also pre-author your future, including your death.

Your entity has already explored multiple probable deaths for you - quick accidents, long illnesses, peaceful passings in sleep, dramatic exits that serve others' growth. When the time comes, you'll choose the one that best serves the completion of your incarnation's purpose... not from ego, but from entity, not from fear, but from creative closure.

The hidden teaching is this. You are not trapped in a timeline that's happening to you. You are surfing through probabilities, selecting moment by moment which version of past, present, and future to experience. And the selector, that's you, the eternal you, the entity level you that never stopped being the author of this entire story.

This hidden teaching threatened to collapse entire spiritual industries... the workshops, the healers, the regression therapists, the gurus promising to clear your karmic debt for the low price of $5,000.

In unpublished sessions from 1973 through 1975, fragments of which appear obliquely in the Unknown Reality, but never fully explained, Seth systematically dismantles the concept of karma as commonly understood in western spirituality and his statement is unequivocal. There is no cosmic ledger, no punishment for past life sins, no balancing required. The universe, Seth insists, doesn't operate on debt and credit. It operates on exploration and expansion.

Let me walk you through what he actually says because this is where the suppressed material gets specific. The popular understanding of karma, you suffering now because you were cruel in a past life is, according to Seth, a complete misinterpretation of reincarnational dynamics. Yes, you have other lives. Yes, they influence this one, but not as punishment.

Imagine you're an artist who paints portraits. You paint a king in one painting... powerful, commanding, draped in finery. In another painting, you paint a beggar... vulnerable, desperate, dressed in rags. Are you painting the beggar to punish yourself for painting the king? Of course not. You're exploring the range of human experience. You're understanding power from both sides. You're mastering the nuances of the human condition by inhabiting its extremes. That's what your entity is doing through reincarnation.

If you were a tyrant in one incarnation and a victim in another, it's not because the universe is evening the score. It's because your entity wanted to experience both sides of the power dynamic to understand it fully, to know from the inside what power feels like, what powerlessness feels like... not as moral judgment, but as comprehensive education.

Seth reveals in these hidden sessions what karma actually is - a creative feedback loop, not a moral judgment. You return to similar themes, not because you failed them, but because you're refining your mastery.

Think about it. Does a musician practice the same scale over and over because they're being punished? No. They're developing nuance, precision, artistry. Each repetition reveals something new.

In one particularly striking suppressed session from 1974, Seth addresses a question about why some people seem to suffer more than others. And his answer (this is the part that made the publishers nervous) is that suffering isn't distributed by cosmic justice. It's chosen by entities wanting to explore intensity, contrast, limitation.

Some entities prefer gentle lives of moderate experience. Other entities deliberately choose difficult incarnations because they want the creative challenge.

Seth compares it to video games. Some players choose easy mode. They want to relax, explore, enjoy the scenery. Other players choose the hardest difficulty setting because they want to test themselves to see what they're capable of under maximum pressure. Neither is morally superior. They're just different approaches to experience.

Here's what this means for you... and this is the part that was too radical to publish in the 1970s... If there's no karmic debt, then you don't need anyone to clear it for you. No guru can absolve you of debts that don't exist. No healer can balance scales that the universe never created. No amount of past life regression therapy will uncover the original wound that's supposedly causing all your current problems... because wounds aren't carried forward as punishment... they're carried forward as chosen themes your entity is exploring.

And here's the liberating part. You can drop those themes anytime you want... not by clearing karma, not by paying off debts, but by simply choosing a different focus.

Seth offers an analogy in the suppressed material that I found incredibly helpful. He says, "Imagine you're an actor in a theatrical troop. You've played the victim in several productions. The audience loved it. You got deep into the role. You learned everything there is to know about victimhood, but now this season, you're tired of that role. You want to play the hero. Do you need to balance your previous victim roles by suffering as a hero? No. You just audition for a different part. The director, your entity, says, "Great, you've mastered victim. Let's explore hero now." And the play changes.

What this means practically... stop accepting suffering as deserved. Stop viewing your challenges as punishment for mistakes you can't even remember from lives you're not sure you lived. Instead, reframe them. Every hardship in your life is a research project your entity is conducting.

Try this exercise... and this comes straight from Seth's framework in the unpublished notes. List three current hardships in your life. Write them down. Next to each one, write this question: What is my entity trying to understand through this experience? Not why am I being punished, but what am I researching? Maybe you're researching resilience through financial struggle. Maybe you're researching authenticity through betrayal. Maybe you're researching self-love through illness.

When you reframe challenges as experiments rather than punishments, something profound shifts. You're no longer the victim of cosmic injustice. You're the researcher conducting the experiment.

And here's the key. Researchers can change the experiment mid-stream if the data isn't useful anymore. You don't need cosmic permission. You don't need to balance anything. You just need to say, "Okay, entity, I get it. I've gathered enough data on poverty. I've gathered enough data on rejection. Can we research something else now? How about abundance? How about being cherished? And if you make that declaration with genuine willingness to explore the new theme, not from desperation, but from curiosity, your entity hears it.

The probable futures where you explore different themes become more accessible. The timeline shifts in the suppressed sessions. Seth addresses the fear that always comes up. But what about Hitler? What about serial killers? Are you saying they don't need to balance that karma? And Seth's answer, which the publishers absolutely could not print in 1974, is essentially that those entities will likely choose incarnations where they experience the receiving end of cruelty, not as punishment, but to complete their understanding.

An entity can't fully comprehend power until it's experienced both wielding it and being crushed by it. But it's always voluntary research, not compulsory penance.

The hidden teaching is this:

The universe doesn't keep score... because the universe isn't moral.

It's creative.

You're not here to be good. You're here to be comprehensive,

to know all of it, to taste every flavor of existence.

And when you're done with one flavor, you can choose another without needing to atone for having tried the first. That's not permission to be cruel. It's liberation from the belief that you're being punished for something you don't remember doing to someone you've never met in a life you can't recall.

You're free. You always were.

This teaching almost didn't make it into even the private archives. When Rob transcribed this session from 1971, later referenced only obliquely in Seth Speaks, chapter 18, he added a note that read, "Jane extremely uncomfortable with this material. worried about interpretations”.

And I understand why, because what Seth suggests here borders on disturbing. Other people in your life are simultaneously real as independent consciousness and projections, as constructs shaped by your beliefs about them.

Let me try to explain this carefully because this is where Seth's model gets genuinely mind-bending. According to these suppressed sessions, physical reality isn't a single shared stage where we're all experiencing the same play from different seats. Instead, reality is more like a multi-dimensional hologram where each consciousness is both projector and actor. You are each living in a private version of reality that overlaps with but doesn't perfectly match anyone else's reality.

Here's what that means practically. The you that exists in my reality and the you that exists in your own reality are different probable selves. Both are real. Both are valid, but they're not identical. They exist in slightly different probable realities co-created by our different beliefs and expectations about each other. When you interact with another person, let's say your father, you're not encountering him as he truly is. You're encountering your interpretation of him shaped by your beliefs, expectations, and the psychic agreements you've made with his entity.

He simultaneously is encountering his interpretation of you, shaped by his beliefs about who you are and what you mean to him. Both versions are real. Both are co-created, but they exist in different probable realities that overlap enough to allow interaction, but don't overlap completely.

Seth uses this analogy in the unpublished notes: Imagine two people painting the same landscape, but standing in different locations. One sees the mountain from the east bathed in morning light. The other sees it from the west catching the sunset glow. Are they seeing the same mountain? Yes and no. The mountain is real. But their perspectives create genuinely different visual experiences.

Now apply that to consciousness itself. You and your father are each painting your experience of the relationship from different metaphysical locations. The relationship is real, but you're experiencing different versions of it.

Here's where this teaching was suppressed... because the implications are staggering. You can literally change another person by changing your beliefs about them... not through manipulation, not through mind control, but through a probability shift.

If you've held the belief for 30 years that my father is incapable of expressing love, you are literally residing in and co-creating a probable reality where a version of your father who cannot express love is your experience. That version of your father is real. He exists. But he's not the only version. There's also a probable reality, equally real, equally valid, where a version of your father who can express love exists.

The hidden teaching that made the publishers panic is if you shift your belief, not through denial or forced positive thinking, but through genuine openness to a different probability, you can shift into that other reality, the original father. He still exists in the probability where you held the old belief, but you're no longer experiencing that probability. You've moved. And the version of your father in this new probability is different because you're different. Your beliefs about him are different. And those beliefs are literally constructive forces that shape which version of him you encounter.

In a suppressed 1971 session, someone asks Seth the question that everyone who hears this teaching wants to ask: Does this mean other people are just Non-Player Characters in my game? Just figments of my imagination with no independent existence? Seth's NO answer is crucial. Other people are simultaneously independent entities with their own agendas and reflections of your inner state. Both and not either/or. They exist. They have their own entity level purposes. They're not your puppets, but the version of them you experience; the role they play in your reality is absolutely shaped by your beliefs and expectations.

And because they're also creating their reality, the version of you in their reality is shaped by their beliefs about you. It's collaborative. It's co-creative. It's like improvised theater where everyone's making it up as they go... with loose agreements about the plot.

Here's what this means practically, and this is where the ethical vertigo sets in. If you change your beliefs about someone, they might literally seem to become a different person... not because you're brainwashing them, but because you've shifted into a probable reality where a different version of them is your experience.

I've seen this happen in my own life, and it's both eerie and liberating. There were people I'd written off as toxic, impossible, irredeemable... but when I genuinely released those beliefs... not pretending, not performing positivity, but actually becoming curious about whether a different version might exist... the people changed. They started acting differently around me, saying things they'd never said before, showing up in ways they'd never shown up before. Did I change them or did I shift into a probability where different versions of them were available? Seth would say both are happening simultaneously and trying to parse it into either/or thinking misses the point.

The suppressed teaching includes this haunting Seth quote which I'm paraphrasing from Rob's notes: You are surrounded by artists, other entities, each painting their own world. You share the canvas, but not the vision. And that's the beauty. You're never truly seeing what they're seeing. You're seeing your interpretation of what they're seeing and they're seeing their interpretation of your interpretation. It's mirrors within mirrors and every reflection is real.

Here's why this teaching was dangerous... because it implies you're not trapped by other people's limitations. If your mother can't apologize, that's true in the probability you're currently experiencing, but there's a probability where she can. If your partner is emotionally unavailable, that's true in this version of your relationship, but a different version exists. You access those different versions... not by demanding they change, but by changing your beliefs about what's possible by becoming genuinely curious about whether you might be wrong about them.

By opening to the idea that they're more multi-dimensional than you've been seeing, try this: Think of someone in your life who frustrates you. Now ask yourself... what if this person is more capable, more loving, more aware than I've been believing? What if my belief that they're limited is literally creating my experience of their limitation? Then watch. Watch without expectation. Watch without trying to force anything. Just watch from a state of openness.

You might be shocked at what shifts because the people in your life are partly your creation. And when you stop creating them as limited, they stop showing up that way.

Start to grasp how much power you actually have in your relationships... because this teaching changes everything about how you interact with others. This is the teaching that made even Jane Roberts deeply uncomfortable.

In heavily redacted sessions from 1976 through 1978, Seth addresses the question that no one wanted to put in print: Can I leave this incarnation if it becomes unbearable? His YES answer, which the publishers knew could be catastrophically misinterpreted was that your entity has ultimate authority. If the ego self exits early, the entity adjusts, either completing lessons in the afterlife or re-entering a similar incarnation.

This is not advocacy for suicide. This is context for understanding your sovereignty within Seth's larger framework. According to these suppressed sessions, Earth is a voluntary experiment in dense materiality. Before birth, your entity, that larger multi-dimensional self, surveyed the available incarnations and said, "Essentially, this one, this challenging, beautiful, painful, ecstatic physical experience, I choose this." Your entity knew the risks. It knew about the amnesia that you'd forget that you're eternal and forget that you're creating it all. It knew about the pain, the limitation, the illusion of separation. It knew you might suffer, might struggle, might want to quit halfway through. And it said it was worth it.

The intensity of physical sensation, the challenge of creating within constraints, the artistry of navigating a reality that seems solid and unchangeable … all worth the risk.

But here's what Seth also reveals in the suppressed material. The agreement you made before birth includes an exit clause... not a fixed date, but a range of probabilities. Some entities plan short stays, childhood deaths, sudden accidents... specifically to give other entities, particularly parents and witnesses, particular lessons in grief, impermanence, love beyond form. Other entities plan long arcs, 80 or 90 years of exploration... but all retain the option to leave if the curriculum becomes destructive rather than instructive.

In one of the most controversial passages which Rob marked “not for publication”, “too dangerous”, Seth says something to the effect that suicide is not a sin... but it's usually a misunderstanding. Let me unpack that because this is crucial. The ego self, overwhelmed by circumstances that feel unbearable, believes death is an escape, a way to stop the pain, end the struggle, find peace... but according to Seth, death doesn't work that way.

You don't go to hell for suicide. You don't face punishment or divine judgment. But you do find yourself in framework 2, the non-physical realm, often confused, often surprised, often realizing that the problems you fled are still there because they were never circumstantial. They were internal. The abusive relationship you escaped through death, the belief patterns that attracted it still exist in your consciousness. The depression that felt like it would kill you. The entity level themes you were exploring through it didn't vanish when the body did. And so, according to Seth, most entities who exit through suicide find themselves choosing to re-enter a similar incarnation relatively quickly, not as punishment, but as creative persistence... like a student who drops a difficult class and then realizes they still need the credit. So, they re-enroll next semester.

Here's why this teaching was suppressed. Publishers feared it would be read as permission, as encouragement. But Seth's intent was the opposite. His message in these sessions is if you remember you chose this incarnation, you gain the perspective to endure it... not stoically, not through gritted teeth, but creatively knowing the entity has backup plans. Knowing this isn't your only chance, knowing the stage is temporary, but the actor is eternal.

Seth offers an analogy that I found helpful. He says, "Imagine you're watching an incredibly intense movie. The protagonist is going through hell, betrayal, loss, injustice, suffering. You're gripping your seat, emotionally devastated by what you're watching. But part of you remembers it's a movie. The actor is fine. This is performance, not reality. The story has meaning precisely because it's so intense.

That's what your entity's relationship to your life is like. It's watching this incarnation unfold with compassion, with fascination, but without the terror that this is all there is. It knows you're playing a role. It knows the curtain will eventually fall. It knows that no matter how dark the second act gets, there's a third act and then applause and then the cast party where you laugh about the scene that almost broke you.

The hidden teaching isn't 'feel free to quit'. It's 'remember you're larger than this'. When you access that memory, even briefly, the despair loosens... not because circumstances change, but because your perspective on them changes.

Here's what this means practically. If you're in crisis, if you're genuinely considering whether to continue this incarnation, Seth offers a different approach than either white knuckling through or surrendering to ending it. He suggests communication with your entity.

Try this practice... and this comes directly from the suppressed material. Write a letter to your entity... not to God, not to the universe, but to the specific individualized larger consciousness that chose this life for you. Say something like, "Entity, I'm struggling. This incarnation is harder than I expected. I'm not seeing the point anymore. The pain feels meaningless. I don't know if I can continue. So, I need you to show me... what am I missing? What did I come here to learn that I'm not seeing yet? Because if this is just random suffering, I don't want to be here. But if there's a purpose I'm not grasping, help me see it.

Then listen... not with your thinking mind, but with the quiet awareness underneath thought. The answer won't come as your fear voice, that desperate inner critic that tells you you're broken or worthless. It'll come as a different voice entirely... calm, affectionate, sometimes with unexpected humor... from the part of you that's still in framework 2, watching this incarnation unfold, rooting for you, proud of you for taking on something this challenging.

You might get images. You might get insights. You might just get a sense of being held, of being less alone than you thought. But the response will shift something because you've just remembered you're not a victim of life. You're the author of it. And authors don't abandon their stories halfway through... not when the climax is still coming.

The Earth is a classroom you enrolled in voluntarily. And yes, you can leave. But maybe, just maybe, you stay not because you have to, but because you remember why you came. This teaching was partially published in the Nature of Personal Reality, but the full implications, the actual physics of thought were kept locked in the private archives. And when you understand why, you'll realize just how revolutionary this concept actually is.

Seth describes thoughts not as ephemeral mental events, not as abstract electrical patterns bouncing around your neurons, but as electromagnetic constructs with measurable reality. If current science had the instruments sensitive enough to detect them, Seth says, we could photograph thoughts. We could measure their frequency, track their movement through space, watch them interact with other thought forms like weather systems colliding in the atmosphere.

Every thought you think is a thing. It has shape, it has frequency, it has force, and it literally rearranges molecules. In the suppressed sessions from 1972 through 1974, Seth goes deep into the mechanics. He explains that thoughts are always pre-existent before an object physically manifests. Reality first exists as a thought form in framework 2, that non-physical realm where consciousness operates without the constraints of space and time. In framework 2, the thought gathers intensity, accumulating electromagnetic energy, pulling in other compatible thought forms, coalescing like a storm system, gaining strength like over warm ocean water. When the thought reaches critical mass, when it's been held with enough consistency, emotion, and conviction, it graduates into physical reality. It crosses the threshold from invisible to visible, from probability to actuality.

The chair you're sitting on... Seth says it was once a carpenter's thought which consolidated into a blueprint which attracted materials which pulled in labor which became the chair. Every step was thought becoming matter. The chair doesn't stay manifested on its own. The carpenter's original thought combined with the collective human agreement that chairs are solid and stable maintains its physical reality moment by moment.

But here's where it gets wild. Your body, Seth says it's your continuous thought about yourself updated millisecond by millisecond. You are literally thinking your body into existence right now. Your belief about your age, your health, your appearance... these aren't reactions to your body, they're instructions your consciousness is sending to your cells, telling them how to arrange themselves.

In one of the most striking suppressed passages, Seth says if you stopped thinking your body into existence for even a moment, it would vanish. But the thought is so habitual, so automatic, so deeply embedded in your consciousness that it feels like the body exists independently. It doesn't. You're creating it continuously, the way a projector creates an image on a screen continuously. Turn off the projector, stop the thought, and the image disappears.

Now, here's the part that made publishers panic. Mass events are collaborative thought forms created by millions of consciousnesses agreeing to explore shared themes. Wars, pandemics, economic collapses, natural disasters... Seth says these aren't random occurrences or purely physical events... they're electromagnetic manifestations of collective thought patterns. No single person causes a pandemic, but every person whose thoughts habitually align with fear, separation, vulnerability, and scarcity is contributing electromagnetic energy to a collective thought form that can manifest as pandemic.

Think about it. When millions of people are simultaneously thinking about disease, death, the fragility of the body, the danger lurking in the environment... when news cycles amplify these thoughts, when social media spreads them virally, when governments implement policies based on them... that's massive electromagnetic focus. That concentration of thought energy doesn't just float harmlessly in the ether. It manifests. It creates the very conditions being feared. Seth is careful to clarify this isn't blame. You're not at fault for co-creating disasters, but you are participating.

from YouTube /@EnigmaLaw7 on November 18, 2025