How
does faith healing work? Are some of us genuinely able to heal
others by touch or through prayer? When I was a young man I recall a
time when my girl friend's 5-year-old son developed a very high
threatening fever, I wrapped myself around his shaking body in a
fetal position and focused all of my intent on reducing his body
temperature, drawing down his fever. After an hour or so of direct
contact with Dylan, focusing on coolness and restoring his health,
his fever broke and he was back to his playful, happy self again by
morning. In another instance, when I was very crippled at age 26
from an acute reaction to a Lyme bacterial infection, a group of five
young people laid hands upon me, speaking a prayer in a dialect I
could not recognize, enabling me to walk immediately thereafter
without pain when minutes before I could not even stand without
faltering.
Time
and again throughout my life, I have either witnessed or read about
how some people have a seemingly innate ability to effect healing in others.
Faith healers have been around from time immemorial. The Christian
faith, along with most mystical traditions, has story after
remarkable story of healers from Jesus to a great number of saints
and shamans who have performed focused acts of intent that have been interpreted as miracles. But are they really miracles, or is
this ability something all of us can do with a little bit of skill, a bit of
faith, and a whole lot of love? Is there a particular disposition
that makes some of us better healers than others?
It is
said that most healers seem to lose a sense of their own identity as
they engage in a healing practice, tending to perceive themselves as
becoming one with the person they are interacting with. I certainly
felt this in my experience with Dylan. For a time, I sensed no
boundary between us, existing in a sort of joint consciousness,
wherein something impersonal beyond each of us carried out the actual
healing, which, of course, could be interpreted in any number of
ways.
Dr.
Stanley Krippner is an American psychologist and parapsychologist who
has researched and written extensively on the unlimited nature of
human possibility, and is considered one of the leading theorists on
the topics of altered states of consciousness, dream telepathy,
hypnosis, and shamanism. In Krippner's scientific experience, some human
personalities are better suited for healing than others. People with
healing abilities tend to be people who are sensitive, vulnerable,
and creative, tend to get involved in relationships quickly,
experience altered states, and easily flit between reality and
fantasy. Krippner classified healers generally as those with “thin
boundaries”. Upon being administered a test called the Hartmann
Boundary Questionnaire, developed at Tufts University by psychiatrist
Ernest Hartmann, thin boundaried people tend to be open, unguarded,
and undefended.
On the
other end of the gradient for this testing that reflects a person's
psychological armament are well-armored “thick boundary” people,
who tend to be defensive, though well organized and dependable.
These are people with a steady sense of self that remains locked
around them at all times; not the healer type. This kind of
inflexible sense of reality seemed to block these individuals from
perceiving or acknowledging intuitive information. They are also not
likely to have psychic experiences or be susceptible to hypnosis.
Those
with thin boundaries generally don't repress uncomfortable thoughts
or separate feelings from thoughts. They tend to be more comfortable
than thick-boundaried people with the use of intention to control or
change the things around them. In addition to healers, those who are artists,
musicians, or otherwise creatively engaged tend to score on the
thin-boundaried end of the scale. Such creative types readily lose
themselves in their passions as if under hypnotic trance, and all seem
more than ready to accept alternative perspectives of reality.
It is
quite easy to categorize those that we know well into one or the
other of these classifications. Krippner's findings would certainly
seem to substantiate my own personal experiences. I took a Hartmann
Boundary Questionnaire just for kicks and scored a 52. If
you're curious where you stand, try it yourself at this link.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.