It is
the stories we tell that define us. Our stories relate the way we
look at the world. From these we shape our societal structures and
our relationships with each other and the environment around us; our
stories show the way we do business and educate our young, and how we
organize and divide our planet. Our science is not so much the
ultimate last word on truth as it is yet another story, shifting with
time as we make new discoveries.
Our
current scientific story is more than three hundred years old,
originating with the remarkable discoveries of Isaac Newton. In many
ways we still live in a 17th century mind-set. In this story the
universe is a place in which matter moves within three-dimensional
space and time according to certain fixed physical laws. It is a
reliable place with well behaved and easily identifiable matter. But
Newton plucked the Creator from the world of matter, ripped out the
heart and soul from matter, and left in its wake a lifeless
collection of interlocking parts.
Our
current story also arises from the evolutionary ideas of Charles
Darwin who suggested that survival is most likely only for the
genetically fittest among us. Darwin told us we came to this life in
a random way, that we are predatory, purposeless, and solitary. He
told us we were no more than an evolutionary accident and that if we
want to survive we must be the best. He might as well have said that
we are genetic terrorists and that it is imperative that we dispose
of the weak in order to survive. This story idealizes separateness;
we have been told for three hundred years that life is a zero sum
game, that for every winner, there is a loser. And so that's the way
we have come to believe our world really is.
These
paradigms – that the world is a machine, that humans have to
compete for survival – have led to our technological mastery in
our world, but at what cost? On a spiritual and metaphysical level
we are desperately isolated. Newton and Darwin have brought us no
closer to any understanding of the fundamental mysteries of our own
being – how we think, where life originates, what it means to get
ill, how a single cell can turn into a fully formed person, and what
happens to human consciousness when we die.
The
story that we have all grown accustomed to, however, is about to be
replaced with a drastically revised version. With new discoveries in
the past century, the emerging story suggests that we essentially
exist in unity, and are furthermore interdependent, with every thing
impacting everything else at every moment. The coming changes and
their implications are extraordinary.
With
our emerging understanding of our quantum reality with its invisible
web that we live in, we are going to have to rethink our definition
of who we are and what it now means to be human. If we're constantly
interacting with not only our own local environment, but with the
entire cosmos as well, then our current notion of human potential may
be but a hint of what is possible.
Winning
and losing lose their meaning if we no longer think of ourselves as
separate. No more us and them; we're all “us”. When we redefine
what it means to be “me”, we'll have to reform the way we
interact with other people, animals, plants, and the world at large.
We will need to reconsider how we choose and carry out our work,
structure our communities, and raise our children. We may even have
to abandon all previous societal creations and imagine a new way to
live and an entirely new way to “be”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.