Why do
we age? With all the advancements we have made in medical science,
why aren't we able to extend our time here on Earth and live a lot
longer? One theory is that aging is caused by a decline in
mitochondrial function. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of the
cell, their proteins converting nutrients into chemical energy that
we need called ATP. The interesting thing about mitochondria is that
they are actually another completely unique organism living within
each of our cells, and there is not just one of them per cell, but up
to hundreds or even thousands of mitochondria in each cell.
When
we are young and healthy, everything works at its optimal best, but
as we age we gradually lose mitochondrial function and have less and
less ATP available. The theory is that as our ability to make energy
decreases, we age and increasingly experience degenerative diseases.
Mitochondria
were once free-living organisms that joined our cells in a symbiotic
relationship about two billion years ago. They were originally
alpha-proteo-bacteria that can still be found living freely throughout
the world. The important thing is that these mitochondria have their
own DNA. They brought their own genome with them when they merged
with our cells. Many of the genes of their DNA have been transferred
to the nucleus of our cells, so really we are just a mesh-mash of two
species living together.
The genomes of the mitochondria and our nucleus are not the same and need to constantly communicate with each other to maintain their coexistence and keep things functioning in a healthy manner. One of the problems that may be a factor in our aging is that these two bodies lose some of their ability to communicate with each other. Throughout life our mitochondria generate free radicals during metabolism that damage our enzymes and DNA, and especially the DNA within the mitochondria, so we begin to lose the code within our mesh-mash of mitochondrial DNA. We get mutations and big deletions that accumulate over time. If we could slow down this damage to our DNA, the idea is that perhaps we could delay aging, be healthier, and have a longer life.
The genomes of the mitochondria and our nucleus are not the same and need to constantly communicate with each other to maintain their coexistence and keep things functioning in a healthy manner. One of the problems that may be a factor in our aging is that these two bodies lose some of their ability to communicate with each other. Throughout life our mitochondria generate free radicals during metabolism that damage our enzymes and DNA, and especially the DNA within the mitochondria, so we begin to lose the code within our mesh-mash of mitochondrial DNA. We get mutations and big deletions that accumulate over time. If we could slow down this damage to our DNA, the idea is that perhaps we could delay aging, be healthier, and have a longer life.
Since
this theory was proposed more than half a century ago, we really have
not had much success in slowing free radical damage to DNA,
unfortunately. No matter how many antioxidants you take, they
really do not have much of an impact on reducing DNA damage. On the
flip side, more recent evidence suggests that free radicals may
actually be beneficial on net and actually extend life span. So the
science is far from settled in regard to free radicals.
Recent
research is demonstrating that if you catch aging early enough, it
may be reversible to some degree. Approaching the aging issue by
attempting to improve communication between the nucleus and the
mitochondria has shown more promise than attempting to manage free
radicals in holding back the tide of aging. Findings in 2013 showed
that perhaps one of the main breakdowns of communication results from
the nucleus believing it is not getting enough energy from the
mitochondria anymore, so it slows sending signals to the mitochondria
to generate more energy. It is believed that this entire winding
down cycle begins with the loss of a small molecule called NAD
(nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) that is critical for cells to
maintain their communication.
When
NAD levels were restored to youthful levels in test studies with
mice, their mitochondria were revved up again, remarkably within a
week, but there was no evidence that muscle strength was improved.
While there is promising test-tube data and animal research regarding
NAD boosters, no human clinical results on them have yet been
published. Supplements containing nicotinamide riboside, or NR, a
precursor to NAD, may be able to boost NAD levels, but the jury is
still out.
The
increasing number of NAD findings lead us to an ongoing story about
certain enzymes called sirtuins, which have been implicated as key
players in conferring the longevity and health benefits of calorie
restriction. Resveratrol, a wine ingredient, is thought to rev up one
of the sirtuins, SIRT1, which appears to help protect mice on high
doses of resveratrol from the ill effects of high-fat diets. A slew
of other health benefits have been attributed to SIRT1 activation as
well.
NAD
fuels the activity of sirtuins, including SIRT1 - the more NAD there
is in cells, the more that SIRT1 does beneficial things. One of those
things is to induce formation of new mitochondria. NAD can also
activate another sirtuin, SIRT3, which is thought to keep
mitochondria running smoothly. SIRT1 helps insure that communication
signals get through between the nucleus and mitochondria. When NAD
levels drop, as they do with aging, SIRT1 activity falls off, which
in turn makes the crucial signals fade, leading to mitochondrial
dysfunction and all the ill effects that go with it.
NAD
boosters that can be found on the market might work synergistically
with supplements like resveratrol to help reinvigorate mitochondria
and ward off diseases of aging. While resveratrol has hogged the
anti-aging spotlight over the past decade, an increasing number of
studies show that a resveratrol-like substance called pterostilbene,
found in grapes and blueberries, is a kind of extra-potent version of
resveratrol. The pterostilbene molecule is nearly identical to
resveratrol's except for a couple of differences that make it more
"bioavailable" (animal studies indicate that about four
times as much ingested pterostilbene gets into the bloodstream as
resveratrol). Test-tube and rodent studies also suggest that
pterostilbene is more potent than resveratrol when it comes to
improving brain function, warding off various kinds of cancer and
preventing heart disease.
Scientists
reportedly have characterized the effects of these precursors to NAD
and supplements on metabolism as "nothing short of astonishing,"
at least in mice. Evidence for the beneficial effects on human
cerebral function is just beginning to emerge. Pterostilbene use
points to improved brain health as well as we age, with beneficial
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory outcomes. Human studies are still
lacking, but it may be worth giving these supplements a try to
measure any personal improvements to energy or strength, and just
cross your fingers that you may be aging more slowly and delaying
degenerative disease.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.