Dissent
is the immune system of society. Suppressing dissent doesn't just aim to get
rid of pesky political protesters and conspiracy theorists, it also
aims to prevent the innovations and solutions society needs to adapt to
changing conditions. History shows that suppressing dissent dooms a
society to sclerosis, decline, and collapse.
Regimes
that lose public support always make the same mistake; rather than
fix the source of the loss of public trust - which is ALWAYS the few
enriching themselves at the expense of the many - the regime reckons
the problem is dissent. If all dissent is suppressed, then everyone
will accept their diminishing lot in life and the elites can continue
on their merry way. Or so they imagine! Dissent
is a relief valve - shut it down and the pressure builds to the point
that the system explodes. Regimes that no longer tolerate anything
but the party line are doomed to fall in one of two ways: Either the
pressure builds and the masses revolt, tearing the elite from power,
or the masses opt-out and stop working to support the regime, so the
regime slowly starves and then implodes.
The
Big Tech monopolies in America today - Facebook, Twitter and Google -
are effectively suppressing dissent in three ways: Shadow
banning where the
audience who gets to see your content is throttled back to a fraction
of your pre-shadow-banning audience; the mechanics are shrouded in
secrecy, Stasi-style. Second is De-platforming
where a Big Tech monopoly declares you persona non grata for a
supposed violation of their Kafkaesque Terms of Service and bans your
content from their platform, effectively silencing you. And
third is De-monetization
where your content is
still officially on the platform in truncated form, but the flow of
advertising revenue is turned off; you are welcome to post content
but you will no longer be able to make any money from it.
When
you crush dissent and spend a full year cracking the skulls of
protesters, you end up with what we have witnessed this year with
France's general strikes. Here in the United States, dissent gathered
momentum when all dissent was lumped together as "fake news"
or "Russian propaganda." What better way to throw the baby
out with the bathwater than declare any dissent from the approved
party line as "fake news" or "Russian propaganda."
The
catalyst was a completely fake "list of Russian agents"
assembled by an unidentified source called PropOrNot in 2016. The
Washington Post and other corporate media outlets immediately
published the baseless accusations without bothering to seek the
identity of the accusers or establish any sort of objective standards
to judge the validity of the accusation. It was pure Orwellian.
In
police-state fashion, Big Tech took the list of accused, declared all
those named guilty and promptly shadow-banned, de-platformed, or
de-monetized everyone without coming clean about how they engineered crushing the dissent. In classic Stasi fashion, the mechanics are all
black box - the accused are never confronted with their accuser,
never provided with the evidence of their "crime," and
never given an opportunity to defend themselves against the false
accusation. No due process whatsoever.
Everyone
on the PropOrNot list was declared guilty until proven innocent, but
there was no way to prove innocence. Kafka, meet Orwell - a
completely opaque, privately owned Stasi (Facebook, Twitter, Google)
does the elites' dirty work, concealed behind the impenetrable
bureaucracy of algorithms, secret guidelines and Terms of Service
which can be interpreted in whatever way serves the gatekeepers'
interests.
Suppressing
dissent guarantees disorder and collapse. The frantic efforts of an exploitative elite to eliminate dissent only accelerates the regime's
path to collapse. America's contemporary Stasi cannot stand. Thank
God we are at the beginning of a regime change with a Dissenter in
Chief in the Oval Office.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.