When I
was a kid growing up in the 1950's, we had a single household rotary
dial phone. I still remember the number – PLYMOUTH-6056; I
remember being told to keep calls short in length because long
distance charges were expensive. The first handheld mobile phones
emerged sometime in the mid 1970's; they were even more expensive,
but a necessary upgrade for anyone seriously wanting to do business
on the go. As tariffs on phone service dropped, communications on
both land lines and mobile phones exploded. I owned a telecom
reseller company in the 1980's and was spending over a thousand
dollars a month for business calls at the best rates available at the
time. By the mid-1980's, people lined up in droves to buy the first
cellular phones at upwards of four grand a pop. At two pounds they would
hold a charge for about half an hour before needing recharged
overnight. But that was progress, and these bricks sold like
hotcakes. Then we look at today's communication devices with touch
screens and unlimited access and storage, sold at cheaper and cheaper rates with more whistles and bells and power than our astronauts
found necessary to get to and from the moon. We've come a long
way, baby.
All
information technology in our modern world has come onto the scene in
just such an explosive exponential fashion, largely the result of
the brilliance of American ingenuity. In many respects, it is becoming harder and
harder to keep up with the ever-changing proliferation of our own
profound innovative creations.
Then I
look at transportation. Automobiles work pretty much the same as
they did when my father drove a large shiny "boat"
following World War II. Today, cars are not really much different
than computers on wheels, even as we witness a merging of artificial
intelligence with our automobiles to make them smarter and safer.
But when we sit down in the driver's seat, start the engine, and put
'er in gear, a car is still a car is still a car. The principle of
personal transportation, in reality, has not changed much from the
dreams of Henry Ford.
The
same thing could be said of airplanes. We are still filling the tank
of our airliners with fossil fuel and depending upon Bernoulli's principle to lift us
off the runway pretty much the same way the Wright Brothers did from
the beginning. The Boeing 777-class aircraft that I fly in today
doesn't look or feel much different than the 727-class craft I first traveled in back in 1972. It cost me over $500 to go coast to coast
round trip then, while it costs me only $300 for the same flight
today, but then the airlines fed me a hot meal at no extra cost and
offered me more leg room back then. Relative costs have gone
down dramatically, and I like to think safety has improved, but an
airplane ride is still pretty much the same old same old technology
as from its inception.
And
what happened to NASA? President John Kennedy set down a daunting
challenge and within a handful of years American astronauts walked on
the moon and returned safely. Aside from a brief foray into shuttles
and the international space station, do you really think our national
dream to adventure into space bottomed out long ago? And do you
think like I do that in fifty years our best and brightest should
certainly have been able to come up with something better than just
shooting rockets into space like a bullet? Modern rocketry has not
moved beyond the 1960's in the most innovative
technologically-advanced country in the world. Really?
It all
works great – the way things are, however. No complaints, really.
But living in the most resourceful, innovative country the world as we do, one has to wonder why science has not applied
innovation to the technology of personal and public transportation in
the manner we have seen in the personal communication and information
industries. The natural rate of technological progression should be
exponential across all fields, shouldn't it? Are you telling me we
have not advanced any further in a century which has been otherwise
an unprecedented time in human history where science and innovation
has exploded?
One
would have to think that someone is holding out on us. The only
technological advancements that have been shared with us seem to be
those where the mighty corporate behemoths could maintain control and
make a buck off of us. If it was not deemed to be profitable,
innovation has not even proceeded linearly - flatlining for much of
the last century.
Any
innovation that has had the potential to decentralize control over
people's lives has been held up or shelved - like free energy and
electrogravitics. Just how much have we been misled, and by whom
(if you don't already know)? While we have become accustomed to
hearing about fake news, the news is no more fake than is science or
medicine or our education system. Conspiracy theory? Nope. None of
what we are taught about dark holes, and gravity, and space travel is
current, for instance. How much of the rest of what we are taught is
unadulterated distracting or entertaining bullshit designed to keep
us in check? And how much has Big Pharma held humanity back from
moving beyond the unnecessary misery and suffering of preventable
degenerative and otherwise iatrogenic disease? These are questions
we need to be asking. These are answers we need to be pursuing when
we stand up and demand full accountability and a disclosure of the
whole truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.